Search results

If this is true, then there are myriad, untold, (vast majority?) of cops walking around with a gun strapped to their hip...while at the same time suffering from work-related psychological devastation. Now, should an officer's work-related mental health issues be the problem of people like...

Can't recall whether she went to the FBI Saturday morning or whether the FBI showed up at her place. I suppose it's possible she cruised over to Comey's yacht, or maybe even boarded the FBI Lear Jet for 3.5 hours.

It looks like my analysis is four days ahead of Pat Buchanan's analysis (not sure if that's a good thing): I did find Pat Buchanan's analysis on the internet, but, it's possible Pat found my analysis on the internet before i found his analysis on the internet. So i think it's valid.

Apparently Ricter found an opinion on the internet saying "extremely careless" is not the same as "gross negligence" that other experts, such as former prosecutor Rudolph Juliani, have opined it means the same thing. Nothing wrong with finding it on the internet but conduit would discount it...

So thanks for admitting that you don't know whether she broke the law in regards to intentionally disseminating classified information, or other information regarding illicit use of a foundation (The Clinton Foundation), as a way to take large donations from ANYBODY, including foreign heads of...

You are deflecting. And now twisting. I asked you to tell us whose statements were backed up in the partisan video i found on the internet that juxtaposes Comey statements with Hillary statements...tell us whose statements were backed, and whose are not. I've told you that gross negligence is...

Oh really? You said you like to back what you say up. Back that up.

Well the FBI is the same gang that blockaded a hi-way in Oregon and shot dead a driver for approaching too fast, and for almost hitting one of theirs (even though he was trying to avoid hitting them). But that's not my point. My point is the FBI is trumping up (no pun intended) charges against...

So here is a "former extremist turned undercover operative" talking to someone at Fox, saying basically the same thing i've said. In the end, he described it as a sort of "honor killing in reverse", to prove to his father's constituents (his father was running a strange long-distance...

So, one way to look at this is that Comey DID "indict" H. Clinton as much as he could. What is a recommendation? Nothing. Who indicts? A GRAND JURY, and it is the DOJ who will decide whether the evidence the FBI gathered should be heard by a grand jury. The DOJ was/is going to decide with...

The report is on the internet from a partisan source, but the cognitive dissonance is demonstrated by contradicting statements made by Comey and Clinton who gave statements while not on the internet. You said you liked facts, or at least your statements to be backed up. In this report, the...

Like i said, it's not proof till Assange releases the hacked emails he got from Guccifer. But Guccifer's claims were evident enough that the FBI flew him to the United States to talk to him.

Oh, look at what else i found on the internet. Not sure if it is the proof you need though because this report is from a partisan source :

If i recall, the hacker's name is Guccifer 2.0 who proved how unsecure it was. He also claims to have hacked the DNC. But i guess it won't be proven until Julian Assange releases Hillary's emails that he got from Guccifer 2.0, who has described, in part, how he broke in. But now, what is a...

When you say that all that matters is there is no intent, you demonstrate how authority is given as an example. You have given her authority to have, at least, been grossly negligent, which is the same as extremely careless, which is also against the law as much as intent. By disregarding the...

What then is your definition of authorized? I doubt its what you think it is.

Which facts or figures in this report (that video) would you say aren't backed up properly enough? And are you saying something has to be available as a hardcover book from Amazon.com to have credibility?

It took a lot more effort to put together that extensive report than it did for you to make that statement. But your statement is on the internet too, so...

I'm not a lawyer either, but did get an "A" in Business Law in junior college. I think the key word here is "authorized". You see, murder is illegal...unless it is authorized. And whatever Hillary has done, it has been authorized, either while it was happening, and/or post facto. She has...

But there is this youtube video: Btw, this video indicates how much tax payer money it has cost for legal teams to prosecute so many issues backed by lies. And here we go again, as Comey has mentioned how many (a thousand?) man hours have gone into this latest investigation.