Search results

Undeniable conclusion?? Based on WHAT? This is nothing more than a mere empty assertion on your part. I asked you earlier, and you failed to reply: Do you believe that something cant hold value simply because it ceases to exist in the future? Do you really think NOTHING MATTERS...

So what? Ok... so the teachings of christ were NOT bloody but GODS were??? Whooopiiie... :p Who you gonna listen to? Gods son or god? Oh wait, he's god too...no wait... what about the holy ghost? Whos that guy? Oh wait... they are all one entity.. Oh wait.... no wonder your totally...

dark:You, as an atheist, are the nihilist, whether you choose to bravely accept that inevitable conclusion or not. Wow! Thanks for telling me dark! I had NO IDEA that I was nihilist! Wheeeeeeew... I better do something about that quick! :p LMAOOO.... where do you get this...

You misunderstand their statement. YOU cant run a FTP server, or an IRC server where thousands of people log into YOUR machine. Its OK to connect to OTHER servers on an outgoing basis such as streaming stock/chart servers. peace axeman

I think Turok already made a similar/better point:: ANY belief system that places requirements higher than than the individual on the individual becomes a great system of control. Be it communism or theism or rampant nationalism, this 'allegiance' to some higher power leads to ugly things...

Actually...depends on the type of atheism. STRONG atheism is a positive belief. The vast majority of atheists, are however, weak atheists, who simply lack god belief. peace axeman

Hilarious!! Your whole argument was based on a strawman fallacy by claiming that I believed the crusades were religously motivated because "the pope said so", (WHICH I NEVER SAID) and your going to accuse ME of lacking critical thinking skills? LOLOLOLOL!! You FAILED to support your...

True.... compared to "all time", given that over 90% of the worlds population is religious, its a simple fact that the millions/billions slaughtered died at the hands of theists. But did you hear the latest about the Crusades??? Supposedly, they were not religiously motivated! LMAOOOO :p...

AGAIN I STATE: If we cant correctly claim that the CRUSADES were religiously motived, then there have been **NO** religiously motivated wars in the history of man kind. An obvious untruth. You can spin and twist all you like, but you cant ignore the obvious. All we need is LAWYERS...

These guys are so way off base its not even funny. Can this get any more absurd? If we cant correctly claim that the CRUSADES were religiously motived, then there have been **NO** religiously motivated wars in the history of man kind. (At least according to their absurd logic :D )...

First of all... thats the SECOND time you put words in my mouth and commited a Strawman fallacy by claiming the reason I believe it is because "they said so". But I already gave reasons, which you IGNORED and instead put words in my mouth again. I believe it because it makes sense and...

Are you asserting that nothing can have value simply because it can cease to exist in the future? If all the joy/pain you feel in life "doesnt matter" simply because we die, then may I come over there and torture you for months while I yell: "But dark! Its OK... because it DOESNT...

I am not rowen. And rowen is definitely not GG. I am not Turok either. That should be obvious as well. peace axeman

"i am the theist showing distrust of a religious person, but you, who claim to be an atheist, are simply assuming he's telling the truth becuase he's a religious person! because he "said so"." LOL..... lets see here... the POPE, the head of the CHURCH, commands his followers to abide by...

Sorry damir... not interested in word games or revisionist history. You may claim to KNOW what was inside the popes head, and CLAIM that it wasnt for ANY religious reasons, but until you make a strong case for that.... all we have is your opinion. Make your case. peace axeman

Hey... I agree he is a hypocritical christian like many, but you would have a hard time convincing anyone he was not a christian. He claims to be a christian, and he is certainly recognized as one by the christian community. peace axeman

I had an admission? You smoking something? :) Religious leaders are more honest??? A blatantly unsupported assertion. More honest than WHO??? I guess the pope was being honest when he sent people to slaughter infidels?? I guess all those molesting priests were being honest too...

Hardly apples to oranges. "more exactly, the comparison is of actions stemming from the physical extension of those disparate beliefs." Exactly.... as the catholic encyclopedia confesses, the crusades were on the behalf of christendom. However, you have failed to show that stalin/mao...

So your admitting that stalin/mao killed people for NON-atheistic reasons. End of debate. peace axeman

Your kidding right? peace axeman