Search results

MADA w/o carryover, turns/trend Sets o 06/05/19 & Logs I notice there are a lot of things that, even when I'm ok with the MT/MR, are still not clear.

Rethinking about it, correct me @Simples if I'm wrong, but I feel pretty sure about that you were the one who talked about this to me already. Here is a thing : Bar 1 : EE, beginning of a long trend, BM long. Bar 2 : XB, a tape is built bar 3 : XB, the tape extinguishes and that second tape...

I need a rest of some days concerning my work on MT/MR/Turns/Trends. I will for 1, 2 or 3 days do some logs and refine my ability to perform VTP, while doing parallely a deeper work into the EEs and its mindmap. I put this thing aside since I began with the MT/MR, and sooner or later I'd have...

Thank you very much for your kind words and comments @Sprout . I deeply hope all is still working out for you. As for the sentiment of satisfaction I could feel, it will be concretely here when the result of my comprehension lead me to change my life more than it's already doing. Currently as...

Correction : What if we've just had a second A-turn in a Set D ? -> the next turn can only be B-turn because of how the trend in the MT is built.

Who/Where is that from ?

That's what causing me troubles for the now, among things. As far as I've read the "butt handed on a daily bsis" Journal (I'm currently at post #703 and the last from jack I have is #1054), no mention is made about MR table use nor process. Wait and see. Here is an attempt to synthetise a bit...

I decided to read and annotate fully the condensed "my butt handed" Journal only made of JH posts as soon as I received the post I'm quoting. So far, my reading is quite slow, I can't do better if I want to understand. As for the fact there are errors in the original tables... I just have to...

Currently reading a LOT

I don't know why but I could not prevent my brain to keep on thinking about this item. The original chart was this one : The issue zone is spotted with the red flag, XR degapped PC at 11:40. This bar is still in the trend, last volume element was T2P. I'd say : for the present moment, n-1...

Well, we've adjusted the missed ID so the problem with T2F disappears. Anyway, I notice and remind that it makes surge again a little issue I've had for quite a lot with the concept of "n+1 test event ". I know no thing surges when it's not time. When it surges, it's because both conditions...

And thanks a lot one more time ! I think then I applied rather goodly the good DDs to the last log I posted.

Thank you very much. and SO, if what you stated is true if PP6 was not present, I assume the DD I made about the way of taping when OB comes along was surely the answer. I'll go with that and see what happens. And then , I'd see the redebriefed snippet as follows :

MADA on 090519 Chart & Logs I will now give myself a break of one or two hours, in order to give my vrain a little rest, and will begin to study the MT/MR problem and the comments you've just posted. At the moment I write I've just seen a notification telling me new messages have been...

Being as - all this can be very long for a single day for me - the T2F is not present on this case because there is a PP1a at 11:30 so then 11:35bar is P1ass, I prefer to skip this problem and face it when it will really come and save some time for the MT/MR and log work. Before going further...

I'll have 4 things to do today. 1 - Deal with the PP1a problem 2 - Deal with the T2F problem 3 - Deal with the MT/MR problem 4 - Do a log 1- The PP1a problem I understand your comment as "yes it does need acceleration to see a PP1a and there is acceleration, so there is a PP1a." Correct me...

I need a rest at the moment, when I'm better I'll study this. Thank you very very much for your amazing reactivity today. Hope all is going nicely for you !!!

I saw a NotPP1a being as although there are three P2s in a row, there is no acceleration, and both PP! sheet and the litterature I have about it says it needs acceleration to see a PP1a :/

MADA w/o turns/trend sets on 08/05/19 & Logs

This produces in my mind deeper thinking. Thank you very much. I'll have to think about this. I've never felt so clearly how questions from you stimulates way more the deductive process than answers would. Thank you very much. Struggling hard at the moment, and it's at the same time very good.