Search results

Building this is helping me. There's just one thing I notice for now, that I need to study and think and read about, is the placement of C-band, T1, P2 of slower fractal, and T2F vs T2P placement

It has never been so pleasurable to go deep into comprehension, refinement, dissection and rereadings. Currently clearing many things, and I want you all 3 to know that your recent posts are stimulating a lot my DDs and my will to work harder. Finally, I'm finding back some great energy. So...

Yes, I've noticed that ;) thank you for the confirmation

The litterature I have about Aa is here : And in terms of table, here is what I have : As it appears, we need the volume elements until T2P included to be present in the trend. On this sequence, I have no T2P. So : -either I missed a T2P before bar 6* - the table I copied has an error...

Correction : bar 8 : T1/P2 bar 9 : P2 repeat bar 10 : BO,T1 of TRUE rtl (FF) Then, what comes next ? : bar 11 : interesting. Here's how I see it : At bar 10's H we have a short BM for BO,T1. at EOB number 11, we have OB. I see several things at the same time : - volume is below prior...

Keeping on refining the same chart, there's something interesting for me here : Bar 1 will be 11:00, the bar initiating the long trend with BM long. It's about VTP and volume elements. So in the following debrief, I'll focus on this exclusively. Bar 1 : BO,T1 and BMrev, P1ass Bar 2 : T1...

Same chart, from scratch once again, try to apply and incorporate last learnings and DDs :

In other words, the first appearing, the first that can be drawn in congruence with the sent of the trend. I'd say beginning rather than established on the bar with BM, to be more precise. On the last pic I posted, it does surge this way.

From this I DD : - there are moments when geometry prevents to draw rtl from the BM established by the EE. - there are moments when geometry allows to draw rtl from the established BM by the EE. Back in time, I had a doubt about what if there is a rtl congruent with next EE creating...

I don't see this true anymore. I think I failed to understand what was true. Working on it and gonna post soon new and maybe better DDs.

I apologize for the bad orientation of the pics

And this would be true also, from what I get for now :

The first two paragraphs make me think the following would be true for the reasons exposed :

Finally, we talk about this and it's a true pleasure. I feel very good that the moment to put this on the table has come. From what I believe that is true : The first condition is to have a T1 present in the trend. AND The second condition is to have a BO by the close, of the prior...

The next of the chart : Bar 1 is 10:45. There was a BO,T1 on prior bar, and close of n bar is outside prior established rtl so BO,T1 = P1ass. Bar 1 : BO,T1 Bar 2 : XR, P1rep Bar 3 : XB, T1 (gate for BO,T1). Close is outside ON T1 so I'd say we have BO,T1 here. There is something fuzzy with...

First scenario w/ context : Bar 1 will be Ab EE so 9:50. Bar 1 : P1 ass, BM long Bar 2: XB, T1 (gate for further BO,T1) Bar 3 : XB, P2 Bar 4 : XR, BO,T1 = P1, BM short Bar 5 : XB, T1, RepBM short. Bar 6 : XR, P2 Bar 7 : OB. I have what I want. Close is outside prior establised rtl, T1 is...

For the first time ever, I feel like a real chart would help me more to know how to react when OB surges on any particular scenario. I just feel overwhelmed by dissecting things through differentiation at the moment AND I feel like I need to open a chart and log it and annotate it if I want to...

Update : Well, after beginning this, I'm becoming aware that there will be much more scenarios in which I'll know how to react, than ones in which I'll find myself stuck. Then, and I don't know if it's what you sere saying @Simples in your last post, but I'll focus exclusively on the cases...

And then I'll build this. I hope then it will lead me to go back to turns/trends ID.

Ok, then, from what I understand, momentaneously let's go back to the 900's Matrix. In my terminology, it would be the 14, 24, 34...104 cases AND with the thorough differenciation as all matters. I'll now build this matrix in question including from 14 ->104 cases, O/C, BMs, rtls, volume triads...