Search results

Damn and Doh! You are exactly right. NT is the software and I get the data feed from AMP. MIRUS uses the same feed as AMP. Thank you for the correction. lj

I posted this a while ago on the "Software Used to Trade JH Method" thread and got no response so I'm addressing any trader who might know. For a rapid read of this post skip to the last two sentences. TIA lj To mods: If protocol dictates it to be necessary, please delete the post from...

I believe it's magic Mr. Black, black magic at that. Kidding aside though, as Joe Doakes once remarked to me, having a Bloomberg terminal and a membership in the CME probably gives one an edge in so far as being prepared for the 'news'. As Hershey traders we do have the STR-SQU, fine tool that...

This is a FYI post with a question. For the past few weeks I have had three data feeds running: DTNIQFeed, IB, and NT. Having done that, the order of preference is for me: NT, DTNIQFeed and IB. The reasons are as follows: IB although ‘free’ to those with an account, sends its data...

In this case (the case of the individual checking out the horse pee), the notion that this might be of consequence with respect to the performance of said pony, does have some precedent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equine_drug_testing lj

I would have to agree with TZ's point in this post. The time period between 1929 and 1932 is when Livermore, amongst others, got screwed because they bought in too early. The Dailywealth article mentions 1932 as the point AFTER which they apply their logic. IMO, that low volume 778 point...

On this page: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113310&perpage=6&highlight=peak%20volume&pagenumber=1047 Jack comments about 'peaking volume' and as well Spyder talks about peak volume and point 1. lj

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113310&perpage=6&pagenumber=1342 lj

The way I looked at what Romanus discovered was that the increasing nondominant volume (red) meant that the point 2 to point 3 transition of the dominant volume (black) had yet to be completed. This holds true for all cases today. I do believe that a hint has already been given in that part...

I made some comments in your chart Romanus. In addition I believe that the 15:10 bar (not shown) is likewise a spike bar and although not an IBGS bar it does have a JW change signal, again NOT for the traverse trader. I also will be doing some looking at previous charts to see if your...

Close, as in, what we (Romanus and I) have said is part of the difference? lj I know what he's going to say but I'll ask anyway.

I think that as you say there are lots of signals for change but not on the TRAVERSE level, i.e., the change signals are for INTRAFRACTAL and TAPE movements. While it has been a bit of a grinder (speaking just for myself) to stay on the 5 min ES as a TRAVERSE trader, all the time, the gain...

This is very nice stuff Romanus and at first reading appears to be on the money. With respect to the red volume textual annotations, I would change 'increased' to 'increasing'. I agree with you (and I see also guavaman says the same thing) that there was no TRAVERSE level signal for change...

I agree with you Romanus: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=113310&perpage=6&pagenumber=1342 lj

Spyder, Just peeping in with a quick multi-part question. Would it be correct that the LM which began after the LM of 10:45-10:55 (TN time=EOB) did so at 11:00? It then continued till it was killed with the second bar of the symP at 11:55. Thus the 11:50 bar cannot be PkV but...

Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. lj

Thank you Spyder (and Romanus) for providing me with a great mound of good stuff to work through and neatly place in my third, 4 inch, 3-ring binder (what a dorque). When I returned to the thread in mid-July, I incorrectly thought that a 1 incher would suffice. Wrong!!. So back to the cave...

Partial quote from Spyder: 09-28-08 09:57 PM (If memory serves) the quote to which (I believe) you are looking for has to do with a Lateral Formation (or Movement) which developed after a signal for change (where the Signal for change formed on the second bar of a Lateral Movement and the third...

As requested, I will do due diligence with respect to the above. Lest there be misunderstanding from others, while I'm searching, let it be very clear that I'm NOT talking about Spyder doing some sort of post facto photoshop-like annotation but rather asking whether in REAL TIME the annotation...

A question for those who see clearly. The attached snippet from 9-24-08 shows a black line with attached question mark pointing to a LM. I snipped off the following statement by Spyder: “A completed sequence followed by Lateral BO FBO followed by change in dominance from red to black...