Search results

I initially went with the overnight carryover of the lateral but to me it made no sense to do so on lookback. So to answer your question the 9:55 bar confirmed the P3. I didn't carry it over so perhaps that answers your question but if it doesn't then could you explain what you mean by"...

Hmm. That was my other explanation for dealing with that nasty little spot, ehorn. I also agree with you that a bold trader would have taken the Type I JW at 15:30 and then we're off to the races again. As a clarification, my chart does not have all the laterals that innersky's does but the...

Thank you very much romanus for your thoughts. They have given me new ways to think about this stuff. The B2B question had more to do with the placement of the signal than its presence. If I put on my Gaussian wizard's hat, I can conjure up a series of B2B's for the 'blue' tape, the 'fat'...

Thanks romanus. Let me mull things over and get back to you after I've mulled and dined. lj

Romanus. I've taken the liberty of defacing your chart with a mess of questions. Although we differ in what happened earlier in the day, we are in pretty good agreement with the events from 13:20 onwards. For your consideration then: Of the two black tapes 1 and 2, which in your opinion...

Hey romanus. Maybe that 13:50 bar had something to do with it. FWIW I still (15:55 EST) don't see a P3 confirmation. lj Edit: The reason I did not see a P3 confirmed was because the IRV BO from the symP (15:15-15:20) was not followed up with more IRV.

Thanks for posting sscott. IMO, bag the down traverse beginning at 11:10, at the least it has its P2 inside your up traverse. Then reassess the up traverse. I'm still extracting the Gaussian essence and won't be posting till I have something worth shredding. lj

Some 25 lbs lighter I feel energized to relay the following. As stated last PM, I did not think the up traverse sequence was completed at that time. However I screwed up this AM by breathlessly anticipating completion and change, and having found one (a change signal) stupidly blew by the...

Given what you say, my crude level of editing capability would only allow me to reset my 'system clock' to EST. lj

Be vewy, vewy careful when you say something like that. At best you are trodding about on thin ice. lj

Unintentional and had to be so, otherwise what I said would make no sense whatsoever, but then that's another matter. Or is it? lj

Ain't it the truth. Am checking out my read on the first 20 bars of this AM (since the 11:05 bar was the one that breached today's early AM RTH). If there was no sequence completion of yesterdays's second up traverse this AM, in unbelievable (ho, ho) contrast to what I had originally...

Shite. Time, once again for a reexamination, and so much for that fleeting sense of certainty. lj

Except to say that you are anticipating and not not predicting (ho, ho). lj

So far today with a hunk of yesterday included. My read has us still looking for a P3 down for this AM's down traverse. The RTL of consequence is the up channel RTL (thick green per Spyder annotation). I don't have the 'very' thick orange super-channel RTL annotated but it would be roughly...

IMO, at this point in time the thick orange lines are super-channel not channel RTL's. The heirarchy you have referenced with respect to 'conditions' imposed on the traverse by the channel may apply as well to a traverse-super-channel combo but I don't know. It would be useful if it did...

That's what I thought (others can be described). So we would seem to be at variance with respect to one of the conditions which you alluded to and seeing as we're not going to have a lateral traverse at this point in time, it doesn't leave much else. See you in the AM after open. lj

Gotta be useful. lj

I agree. A useful Lateral Movement is in force. lj

Hi, Anyone know how to get Pepe's 'JHInfo" tool to hold the offset value for the chart time? I have to reset it (+3 for PST to EST)every time I reboot the program. TIA lj