Search results

Just looking at the snippet, traverse level.

See my previous response :)

You do not have your R2R correctly annotated to see that the IBGS you encountered was operating in a faster fractal. The R2R was from 15:10 to 16:00. IMHO

1. I didn't believe that the 10:15 bar was the actual Pt2 b/c it was inside the CO channel. 2. Did not reverse until the increasing PRV of the 12:15 bar b/c from 11:05 to 11:40 we did not have a proper completion of the down traverse. This is the same situation I discussed a few days ago...

Its a fickle bastid ain't it :D

We agree !!:p :p

Yes I do. It has to do with the software package i have. :p

As we are both incorrect, the prospect of correcting the mistake appear slim :(

Thx, but one error I noted is the annotated Pt3 at the EOD. I think we are still waiting for a Pt3 to form.

:cool:

Yes, I missed the 16:15 bar as IBV w/ close inside previous bar :mad: There is that "non sequential IBV" thing"= nabbing me again :(. Thanks for the correction :)

We require two bars of increasing volume to properly BO a lateral or pennant. My charting software shows an OB w/ IBV @ 16:00 followed by DBV at 16:05 = No SOC. From my perspective anyway.

Probably too early for a post mortem, but my analysis required a completion of the Lateral and Pennant BO from Friday prior to a down traverse.

I have a blind spot when it comes to a completion of a channel. In regards to the discussion here about when did the channel, that started on 12-11 end and when did it complete on 12-12, personally I get hung up on the minutia it seems. I viewed the 9:35 to 10:10 area as the completion...

:)

:cool:

` Please post a specific question and we can go from there.

The 12:20bar finally laid rest to the nagging question of how to look for a SOC post lateral / pennant if the increasing volume BO's are not sequential. So that's good :p

You would be wise not to use my efforts as a guide either way. :D :D

Revision 2 I didn't finish fixing the Gaussian's from earlier :p