Search results

It appears that the Pace Acceleration of 10:20 (V = 49,473) compared to previous bar 10:15 (V = 34,604), both in extreme territory, does not indicate that Price will cycle through again. The IBGS on IRV (10:25) was a traverse level SOC.

My view Edit: 11:52 Maroon Pt3 down is incorrect, 11:15 was Pace Accelration

This perspective should prove helpful in the mornings.

Yes it does, but how? In Dom traverse? In Non Dom traverse? Pre Pt3? Post Pt3? Inc. Vol? Dec. Vol? Price close inside previous bar? Price close outside previous bar?

The drill has highlighted the need for me to differentiate when an OB resets the sequence and when it does not.

12:20 was Dominant. The 11:05 bar was a completion of a sequence (orange TL's) but did not show a SOC. So we needed to cycle through another sequence. Initially I could not justify the IBV at 11:15, having ignored the BO of the [orange] RTL. After many reviews I finally drew in a large...

On the 5 minute ES fractal

12:20 Non Dom??

Similar to two days ago, I have that rather uncomfortable feeling that my analysis of a Pace Acceleration bar (12:50) was overridden by the JW bar at 13:00 Dagnammit!!!

You ain't alone, I have no clue where we are. Too much increasing volume in both directions for me to pin this market down.

I too am in this boat. Understanding each bar and its unique role in the overall context of the trend is a difficult challenge and one that [for me at least] has taken an awful lot of time and focus to clear up. Spyder refers to areas of confusion, to me these are "confusions of the correct...

Can't be because we never cycled through another sequence.

I'm pondering the idea that my analysis of the 14:25 bar as a Non Dom spike bar could be incorrect :D

what a buzz kill

This would make the 11:55 to 12:20 a LM and not tapes :(

I am sure I do not fully understand the question here so my answer that this area builds a Non Dominant traverse is most likely inadequate for the information you seek.

Nicely put :)

I used the 1st bar out of a lateral for my Pt1 there.

Are you referring to the 13:30 bar? If so I gave more weight to this bar being an OB than a Spike bar aspect of it. Since it was a OB the sequence needed to complete itself.