Search results

JB3: >Out of the 5 things I listed, only the last one, the vote >against welfare reform, could have been a package >that contained other things Ron Paul opposed to. Since you've made the above assertion, answer me this ... Why could not the other four have been packaged with things...

JB3: >Why are you so ready to give Ron Paul the excuses >that are not allowed for other politicians? Apparently you don't read well... I DID allow ALL candidates the "excuse" I allowed RP. As proof of the above, I repost my FIRST line of the post you quoted: >"Here's the problem...

Preface: A few months ago I considered RP a whacko/nutjob -- primarily because I was initially exposed to him through the 9/11 whacko/nutjobs on this forum. Little by little, I began to *listen* to what he had to say and I determined otherwise (otherwise regarding RP, not regarding 9/11 or the...

Fortunately, I am unable to search your self created reality. JB

Rat: >no offense but i have been right about almost >everything the past few years Being "right about almost everything" is oh so easy in a self created reality. Cinchy. JB

Here's the problem with a list like the above (for any candidate, not just RP) ... votes are taken in Washington on bills that have *dozens* or even *hundreds* of issues tacked on/in them. For instance (hypothetical), there could be a bill that doubles your taxes, calls for the death...

Jayf >Please don't tell me you are a conspiracy nut >with 9/11 as well. Although it would explain a lot. He is. It does. JB

AAA: >I guess it was the same Justice officials who let >Bush crony Johnny Sutton put two Border Patrol >agents in prison for over ten years for winging a >drug smuggler who attacked them. I'm really strong on the rights of Law Enforcement Officers to defend themselves. I'm also...

fhl: >Tell us again the statistical odds of evolution. How about we both return with some statistical odd -- shall we? I'll bring the odds for a relatively low powered, low IQd, sickly, prickly, die quickly species/creatures to originate through evolution (amazingly large for sure)...

ss: >Consider it a blessing to be on rcanfiel's ignore list. Yeah, in terms of Christians I could hang out with, Rcan and Shoe are certainly on opposite ends of the spectrum (and that's a good thing Shoe :-) ) JB

Rcan: >Somehow, after looking back at a number of your >posts mentioning myself (below), all I see is someone >who rarely says anything of intellectual value, and >mostly offers snide remarks and retorts. At least "I >Am" attempts, misguided a deity as he thinks he is, >tries to say...

No, It's absolutely and properly meant for you. What's good for the goose is generally considered good for the gander after all. JB

JB3: >I would respect him more if he simply stood his ground >and said he believed what he wrote. Or alternative if he >took responsibility and apologized for it. Either way would >be better than being dishonest and claiming that he didn't >know these columns were written with his name...

JB3: >Do conservatives nowadays also have the victim complex? Uh - Yeah! Especially AAA. JB

Rcan: >So here is a simple test. I wrote down 3 >words on my whiteboard. As you are "Jesus" >you should have no problem posting what they are. Well, to look like anything but a fool, you would need to demonstrate that your jesus would be able to past a "simple test" before declaring a...

I've tried -- nothing in response. It's like talkin' to a brick wall. Very frustrating. JB

LOL -- Yes, the Ztroll to perfection. JB

Whhhhiiiirrrrr. Whhhiiiirrrrr. JB

LOL -- Like I would care what the 'Troll Group' thinks about me. No zTroll, in spite of what you would like to believe, you are a follower in the troll world. The behavior was here before you and will be here when you're gone. You are but a rat on the 'wheel of trolls' with your...

More than one person agreeing that political labels are useless is a good thing, not a bad thing -- but then again, that it just the opinion of those of us out here who don't give a damn about labels. JB