Search results

1350 and another 20 we todd linked to recently are skeptical of it. which is the position I hold. We don't need to deny... anything. We state you have no science saying man made co2 causes warming.

thanks... good workd.

being that obama won by 4 that would be an odd coincidence.... and remember for a a time Ronmney was leading so it took a slanted poll to make it look like obama was leading... but... 1. how do you know what that template was?

the science shows temperature leading co2. how many times do I have to present the papers til you actually understand that fact. no sicientist in the world disputes the fact that change in ocean temps precedes co2 levels. why? because the data shows it.

well lets see if they change their ridiculous template between now and election day.

i note I just read the ibd poll.. its 28 dem 22 Rep 25 Ind and trump leads by 2. trump may be winning outside the margin of error if you use the 2012 template.

ok lets do a brain vs anus check. do you sell and repair ac equipment which utilizes a greenhouse gas 2000 times (or more) powerful than co2 for a living? if the answer is yes I passed the brain check and you passed the asshole check --- with flying colors.

I note kellyanne conway was in the news on drudge today talking about the 2012 template vs what might show up on november 8th. I tell you, many on the left and right get their ideas here at times.

this is the case in michigan as well. nothing for hillary lots of trump. according to relatives an la radio station (am 640) had a debate watching party at a convention hall in orange county ca last week. when they asked who was for hillary, then stein etc... more for stein showed up than...

If you think that 33 percent more democrats are going to vote... that abc poll would be legit. dems 36- reps 27- Inds 31 what a ridiculous poll.

A good example of the media trying to shape a vote was in 1980. In a Gallup poll released on October 26th in 1980, two weeks before the election, Jimmy Carter was leading Ronald Reagan 47 – 39. Two weeks later Reagan won in such a landslide that Carter conceded before California was closed...

Here is my thesis. It looks like hillary is winning in some by not all of the national polls. if you apply the 2012 template to the data collected the pollsters then the race is likely in the margin of error. As far the electoral college. I don't have the data or time to apply the 2012...

stop selling your gas 2000 times more powerful than co2 or shut up about agw. you are the epitome of what is wrong with leftists. telling others how to live while doing the opposite in their own lives. and you have a problem with people you deem hypocrites? as you know there is no science...

any time you have peer reviewed science showing that the laggard (co2) is the cause... (change in ocean temps or change in air temps) -- you just let us know. til then you are lying your ass off about science. there is no science showing man made co2 causes warming. if you had any... you...

those are not good polls if they don't release their templates. How would you know what they are doing? nor are they good polls if they are more democrat rich than the 2012 election. which even then is a bit of a gift to hillary because she is not nearly as liked as obama was by democrats.

the data shows co2 lags change in ocean temp by a year and change in air temps by 9 mos. And scientists have been peer reviewed on that.. in multiple articles. you just can wish that away. That is the data. if you could "see" agw in the data. you would publish and you would be first and you...

in the ibd 4 way trump is winning and this is a 4 way race. Do you really think 2 way polls are useful now.

why do you all confuse the fact that I say polls are slanted with the idea that I think trump will win? I have said many times it looks to me like the national race is close after you make these polls use the 2012 template. I have said the state polls would be what matters and I don't have...

ron paul did not confuse anything. maybe its the filters you employ when taking in truth that conflicts with your team's big govt less liberty loving, ferguson protest funding, soros owned lie/spin.

piezoe? we saw you on other threads.