Search results

I will never understand what makes people behave like this. I could understand trolling but then again I can't imagine getting satisfaction from that for more than a couple of weeks. My best guess is that they honestly believe what they post AND at the same time feel smarter than others. How...

Another good example of your critical thinking. I googled the title of your paper and the first link states: "This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." So in conclusion: no, it is again not proof. It...

First: I did provide you the information you need to look for the evidence yourself. The picture you claimed showing all the shots a kid has to take was posted on BMC TV's facebook page (and some other local media) on Jan 10th 2020. And it has nothing to do with your claim. The question is: why...

Ah, I see more critical independent thinkers are joining the conversation. The kind that even makes up stuff in their own journal. I am sorry B1S2, track records do matter so I just automatically assume every statement from you is nonsense. I will change my mind if you post some evidence for...

There is evidence. You just can't seem to find it while it's actually not that hard. It says something about how good you guys are in critical thinking and doing your own research. That's the difference between us. You call others sheep and yourself a critical thinker but you instantly believe...

I'll give you a hint: start with looking for the original picture. Bonus tip: it has a much better resolution than the one you posted. (I wonder why they would post crappy quality that doesn't allow you to read the names of the products in your facebook group)

Hahaha, you are asking for evidence? Seriously? So you post a picture with a complete false claim and now I have to prove your claim is false? Again, what happened with the whole doing your own research thing? At least try, it's really not that hard. Took me a couple of minutes, I am sure you...

I thought you independent thinkers were all about doing your own research? The picture was posted by the parents to show how much effort it took to conceive the baby, NONE of those shots are for the baby. Keep improving on doing research and thinking indepedently please, I think it is an area...

I have not been posting much, but short after I started trading I started following the ES journal on a daily base. After a while I got impressed by the results B1S2 posted so I did what I would think traders like to do: I gathered data and analysed it. For a couple of weeks I spent about an...

The text as a whole is misleading, because it only mentions carefully selected bits of information and leaves out other more relevant facts. That combined with the wrong 3% effectiveness claim shows that the poster wanted to falsely make the reader conclude the Moderna shot is dangerous. It's...

I am not going to list them up for you but here is a link for Belgium: https://www.brusselstimes.com/201359/moderna-no-longer-used-to-vaccinate-under-31s

See my post above: no you didn't post it. The question whether someone would agree the vaccine went from 85% to being restricted because of adverse health effects is dishonest. The countries that chose not to use Moderna for young people anymore did this as a precaution to completely rule out...

That tweet is absolutely wrong and misleading. ARR doesn't mean 'real-world projection' versus RRR as trial stats. In fact, it is rather the opposite. The poster either doesn't understand what ARR is, or is hoping others don't understand so he can falsely claim the vaccines are useless. The...

As I pointed out in my post myself I have no intention discussing the vaccines, I was merely pointing out how important critical thinking is. And with regards to the topic: fact checkers should not be trusted, but they can be a great help to quickly find in what direction one should look to...

What do you mean by 'they are related'? If you mean they are both high-tech medical practices, then yes of course. If you mean they both work in the same way and alter DNA, then no, that is incorrect. I have not interest in starting a discussion about vaccines, there are other threads on this...

...ultimately the mrna vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy... -> As I explained: they are an example FOR cell and gene therapy. I don't know what is so hard to understand about that or what you are trying to say by posting this again. As to why the definiton changed: I didn't...

This is actually a good example of desinformation, whether it be intentional or simply by not understanding the topic well. He doesn't think or 'admit' the mRNA vaccines are a form of gene therapy. Not in this vid you posted, not at any other time. He simply made a remark that the mRNA vaccines...

Though you are not clear in this post I assume you are referring to the mRNA vaccins. These vaccins don't alter DNA, they just use mRNA to have our own body produce the spikes that mimic the virus. Gene therapy works by altering DNA. That's the difference between the two.

March 7th is April's Fools Day? So you are telling me you honestly had no idea the vid was a complete fake? Again: I think you have some work to do on critical thinking.

He hasn't been posting valid arguments, but just mainly dishonest anti-vax nonsense. I am not saying it is bad to be critical about jab safety, but using wrong or just fabricated arguments to claim vaccination is dangerous or not helpful at all I think we can call anti-vax.