Search results

I say it's best to believe the homebuilding CEOs. They have a trackrecord of trust, honesty and the ability to assess the market's situation first hand.

"ROOKIES trade like that, winners do not. " Well then you have to tell me how the "winner trader" made the 100% in period 1 and period 2 in the first place? Likely by taking on big (but calculated) risks. There is no risk free 100% in the markets. Striving for abnormal returns forces any...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16573&rn=289004&cl=1354912&ch=1316259 Jabba the Hut suddenly doesn't know if the market has bottomed. It's great to see he's sh***ing his pants after proclaiming there is no housing crash in May 2006 and "we will bury the shorts", just...

Maybe the lower risk of a smaller account size and knowing they have funds/money outside of the equity account helps them live through longer drawdowns without being squeezed/forced to cover positions.

Don't worry, there are no traders that consistently make 100%, not on a daily, monthly not even on an annual timeframe. Not year after year after year. Maybe there are people who make 100% month 1, 200% month 2 and then are being squeezed and suddenly make -95% month 3. Consistency is key.

I sent a PM :cool:

I couldn't agree more!!!! Now it is our job - as defenders of the free world - to invade, subdue and free these countries. We made a great start in Iraq, but let us hope this is not the end of our efforts. My hitlist as of right now: 1. Iraq (takes 7-8 more years) 2. Iran (We should start...

To be honest, I am not 100% sure, sorry. I thought it was, I just checked their FAQ and it mentioned registration. Sorry about the wrong call.

There's always good ole' trusty http://www.bracket-trader.com

I betcha the PPT is going to be cracking a few bottles of Cristal tonight: Mission accomplished.

Another way of looking at it: 1. +50% 2. + 50% 3. -50% is < than 1. +5% 2. +5% 3. +5%

Just saw that thread, thanks for posting!

I think we just need to trust our administration on this one. According to the Pentagon we just need to "invest" around 15-20k more in dead Marines over a 7-8 year period to finish this mess in Iraq but it will likely help our economy in the long run. I think it's a good investment! Often I...

What? What are you talking about? We just lose about 100 of our men a month but we kill around 3000 of theirs every month. Add to that around 5000 dead civilians monthly. I would say we're winning big time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would say at this rate it will only take around 7-8 years...

No we didn't ignore it at all. We did the right thing. We supported Saddam's army with military equipment and intelligence in order to fight the Soviet supported Iranians. We cashed in on these regimes sending their kids to the battlefields. And we cashed in good.

The question is wrong. You're headed in the wrong direction. Just like in gambling, people love to ask "How much can I make a day". Nobody asks "what is the maximum I could potentially lose a day?"

Good call. Why not take out Venezuela in the same strike, I think it's on the way!!!!!!!

I have another question: What % is possible when I take $100 and goto a casino and randomly put all available funds on black or red? It certainly is possible to walk out with a few hundred million after a few hours, just gotta make the right trad... errrr bets. To answer your question: It...

That worked out well, congrats: USO -2.31%

What a freakshow. 2% a day. To the dreamers in this thread: Do you realize most professional traders and money managers would give an arm and a leg for 2% consistent (year after year after year) returns per MONTH???? Not even talking about daily. Enough said.