Search results

You can list 1 000 000 people and I could list 1. The numbers don't matter, what they say, how accurate it is, whether it makes sense does matter. Further, supernatural is just another way of saying "something we don't understand." Only a moron and the complete opposite of scientist...

Like I said, he's not really here to have a genuine conversation and continuously probing it. He can change that anytime, but doesn't. He just says whatever, not caring if it makes sense. Just a child in a playground arguing about candy without a clue about the real world, it's hilarious and sad...

He's doing all this on purpose clearly. He asks me a question, I ask if he's sincere before answering and he loses it and rambles off on some ad hominem intellecutally dishonest tangent. I asked him if he wanted clear logical proof that science is not anti-religion and he calls that babbling...

i agree! if you are not able to understand what i am saying, please point out where specifically you are confused and i will explain calling an articulate post "babbling" only serves to show everyone your grade level of English comprehension which clearly can be challenged by any intelligent...

i think you are fos and make everything up, really, do you have anything besides BS to offer that all of scripture is a myth? if you think i said i have "indisputable" please show me where i said it ... otherwise, well, i never said that so there ya go, do you have anything else to offer i never...

do you realize that i asked you if you were sincere, you then said asking that is "babbling" and now you babble on about hypocrisy? it's incredible, you are either doing it on purpose or showing everyone what a tortured existence you live under... every single piece of information that is...

LOL. To be scientific is to be objective. To claim there is nothing supernatural in this world is to ignore evidence, to be biased. Whatever. You just state things like you are God and then you call yourself anti-religion? You've just invented your own and it's far scarier.

do YOU realize you have written thousands of words and never said anything? do YOU realize you only derail, distract, avoid, hijack and attack instead of actually participate in a dialogue? so really, you have nothing but BS to offer that all scripture is myth? i'm waiting...

Can you ever be productive, not resort to name calling and just answer a question like you are here to actually participate in dialogue instead of preventing one? I wrote 2-3 sentences and you reply above with ad hominem garbage and call that "babbling". More distract, derail, hijack, avoid...

What context is this quote given in, not only within the whole speech but within the larger context of Jefferson's life progress, other writings, actions, etc? What is he really saying, is this really an anti-religious quote or is it out of context?

Yes Jem, another out of context doozy, from someone who is only looking for stuff to corroborate their pre-conceived opinion. This results in doing things like quoting Mark Twain and Thomas Jefferson as anti-religious. Simply because one is NOT interested in being objective, they only want to...

If you don't understand something I would gladly explain. What is interesting though, is that when you don't understand something you laugh. You start a reply with LOL. It's like anything YOU don't understand is laughable, because, well, you know everything. At least everything that matters...

I am glad you FINALLY asked this, but are you really being sincere? Are you seeing the point and really asking because you see there might be something that doesn't make sense if you can differentiate the two? Or is this more like just take whatever I say and try to twist it around?

"crusaders, trying to make the world a better place, to avoid the only choice being just another religion, but in this one you go within to escape reality which is considered unchangeable because of your karma" ... that's what you meant to say right? :D

this is the same dishonest manipulation that is repeated in other threads: take non-Christians who call themselves Christians (AVOIDING THIS FACT LIKE THE PLAGUE) and then proceed with partial mental retardation to conclude that this selective sample of 1 is representative of real, true...

no really, so you have nothing but bs to offer as your evidence that all scripture is a myth?

i guess you still are missing the hypocritical biased intellectually dishonest part which has been mentioned MANY times, that you are applying two different standards of evidence, one for scripture and one for the rest of history, that is biased and you are clearly biased .... if you remember my...

so you have nothing but bs to offer as your evidence that all scripture is a myth?

This is hilarious Stu: "Can't support what you say so you get pathetic, as usual." Jem: "Please support what you say Stu." Stu: "Grow up."

You are pretty funny. You think you made a point by saying I can't back up something which is not relevant to the bigger picture!? LOL, yeah that makes sense. This is just more distracting, avoiding, detracting, attacking, etc. I stated explicitly that I don't call myself Christian, that I...