What's "real" backtesting experience?
50k or 100k doesn't matter. % return matters. Out of sample testing matters. Whether your strategy can scale to 50k or 100k matters. How you're modelling fills on your backtests matters. Your KPIs matter. Et cetera.
GOSH!
You people are gonna...
Either of those are valid words, so autocorrect wouldn't help you there. But don't sweat it, people worried about your spelling have too much time on their hands.
Pay attention to what the helpful people (NoDoji, etc.) are saying.
If you know nothing about the future, then execute now. Otherwise, you know whether you should execute your 1 share at the current bid/offer or wait.
These are execution benchmarks...
...and people build algorithms that try to replicate or beat the benchmark. Of the two you mentioned...
This is good if you have a fast connection locally. Otherwise, VNC (particularly "tight" VNC) is a heck of a lot faster/lighter than native X protocol, which was designed for local area networks.
A while back I had a UK-based VPS from openitc.co.uk. Top notch.
You'll probably want to install a VNC server (on Debian/Ubuntu this is as simple as "apt-get install tightvncserver") but only run it on the loopback interface, so that you can tunnel your VNC session over an SSH connection for...
If I'm not mistaken, you've stated previously that you don't backtest, due to unavailability of historical data that you would need to do so. Is this still the case?