Search results

Already run out of original material? Or am I just remembering these things?

you are a figment of my imagination, why won't you just go away

aX401, of course i am a hypocrite BUT I WOULD NEVER CONDTRADICT MYSELF

max401, this aggression will not go unchecked, man LD

Max401, are you a nihilist? efundo desipientia 1098 et enumeratio

Jack Hershey, I have searched and read many of your previous posts with great interest. Your suggestion of employing a method by which to measure the nature of market movements is also fascinating. Unfortunately, I am a relative new-comer to the world of stocks and so by my own fault I have...

Max401, word.

I know you understand this, but so as to allay any future confusion I wanted to call attention to the difference between math AS understanding and math as a TOOL for the attainment of understanding.

+Air to breath comment. Despite our quarrels I cannot find fault with your wit!:)

I agree with this clarification of math as a tool for understanding.:)

This is agreeable and I am sorry if I have been difficult. It is merely my notion that history is written by the conquerors and not the conquered that gives me trouble. Right and wrong I believe exist. Both are however, very difficult to pin down. It is often very difficult for me to decide...

I'm sorry, wasn't it you who said a 225 year-old war was not topical enough for comparison? Am I now supposed to ignore thousands of years (in the case of the golden rule) and hundreds of years (Kant, Mills) of philisophical and ethical thought?

Sorry, you may have missed my comments. They are contained within your quote at the end of each line, except for the <> part which contains an asterisk. In this case, your examples were in principle all the same so I responded to them in concert. P.S. Your example of 2+2=4 (Mathematics) is...

We cannot have society without agreements, true. My statement was that society (or the participation therein) is a choice that does not necessarily have to be made. Society had not been mentioned previously, but so long as it has now been mentioned. To what degree must understanding be shared...

Yes, please clarify further.

You have already pointed to many exceptions, which in logic and math are unnacceptable. In addition, your basic assumption that we "must" operate under the assumption that our logical system is sound is false. We 'must' not do any such thing, we may, however, choose to do so and as such accept...

I hereby retract my analogy of US revolutionary war guerilla warfare and Iraqi guerilla warfare.

Thankyou for being forthright.

One cannot dodge what does not exist. If you disagree I emplore you to prove your case.

Please quote where I defended or apologized for anyone, especially suicide bombers.