Search results

  1. M

    Moving Average or Linear Regression?

    Oh, I'm fair...let's see, 1 tera dollar sound good? But it *has* to work for at least three years.
  2. M

    Option in two currencies on the same underlying

    You'd have to hedge FX going forward, which would kill any IA? As a more general question, though, why does the underlying sometimes diverge so much for so long? Can't imagine it's all FX risk, reg risk? eg Wipro, quotes from Yahoo: WIT(ADR) 19.6USD vs 507685.BO (? not sure)...
  3. M

    Writing options for a living

    Yes, and even the first moment plays a role in principal, because the risk-free rate is stochastic, too.
  4. M

    Moving Average or Linear Regression?

    I was about to ask, can anyone give me leading indicator for prices? I'm willing to pay, if it works. :)
  5. M

    Gann Wheel

    d(x + y) = dx + dy, but d(xy) = y dx + x dy, so depending on how you wish to use this number, you might not need 5 digits. [edit] BTW, facetious again, but that's not say I don't enjoy these threads.
  6. M

    Gann Wheel

    You're right, thanks. So was I. [edit] Well, meaning Eco pokes fun at people looking for meaningless (numerical) coincidences in nature. Here, of course, we have progressed from "nature" to "human behavior."
  7. M

    Gann Wheel

    Eco's "Faucault's Pendulum" has a good discussion of these issues.
  8. M

    Writing options for a living

    Agreed. Then you are contributing toward making the markets more efficient. Hypothetically, if they already are, the cost of the hedge would cancel your gains on the stock side, assuming all elswe equal. [edit] OK, but then you're mitigating your profit?
  9. M

    Writing options for a living

    Currency risk, political risk...? You do get excess reward, in expectation, for holding any risk that others want to unload. MM and retail traders also are rewarded for making the markets efficient, I suppose.
  10. M

    Writing options for a living

    Well, almost right. :D
  11. M

    Math question...

    As the previous poster points out, the theory is quite simple, but the devil is in the details, especially once you put in constraints and want to be fast about it.
  12. M

    text book price probability calculation formulas seems to be pretty USELESS

    Looks like you're setting the strike based on the volatility of the (closing) *level* of the SPX? That would explain the high probabilities you're getting. Sorry, I was confused by the initial message and thought you were surprised by the probs you were getting when you were 2 std devs below...
  13. M

    text book price probability calculation formulas seems to be pretty USELESS

    Quick question: how do you set s, your strike? Did you scale the return volatility by sqrt(t)?
Back
Top