Search results

  1. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    Sounds like you are agreeing with me, that it was not a trade on exchange.
  2. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    >> If it was truly "off market" then there is no requirement to report those to Nasdaq or anyone else in real-time. Off market trades must be reported to TRF (Trade Reporting Facilities) and according to OP that's where he have seen the trade.
  3. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    >> He was best bid at 17.10 when two other counterparties exchanged goodies at 17.1001. Yes, I totally agree with your description. OP was at the bid at Nasdaq at 17.10 while two other counterparties exchanged goodies at 17.1001 *off market*. It was offmarket since by reg-nms exchanges...
  4. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    Ok, but the order described in the first post was clearly internalized. So it was indeed off market, and while you are saying that everybody benefits from it, the author believes that his fill was stolen. In any case, it's not correct to blame HFT for it.
  5. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    AmazingIndustry, you clearly know what you are talking about. However I want to point out that I think you are mixing together two different things: - Price/slide, PEP etc orders that are happening at exchanges. That's a well documented shortfall of regnms, that's ironically was introduced...
  6. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    He had a bid at 17.00 on Nasdaq and someone wanted to trade against it. However the incoming order never reached to Nasdaq, but was "stolen" by internalizer that got a look at the incoming order, saw a bid at 17.00 and improved it by 0.0001
  7. D

    Someone steals my fill for one hundredth of a cent (as per TRF)

    Sorry, that's a complete b**t. PIP order can't give subpenny improvement. The order was stolen by retail order flow internalizers.
  8. D

    Spreads tighter than ever before? Think Again.

    It's a complete bullshit. The spread on IBM is around 3 cents. Either he is looking at the wrong venue or deliberately provides wrong information.
  9. D

    Getting a lower sec nscc and those other fees lower

    Nope, started on Wednesday. Trades that happened on Wed are cleared on 21st.
  10. D

    Getting a lower sec nscc and those other fees lower

    Well SEC fee went down 3 days ago from 19.2 to 18.0. Hope it helps
  11. D

    Moo order

    yes
  12. D

    Futures Hammered but why?

    I think the market was pricing it properly. Though the earnings results were generally pretty positive, market was drifting down on the debt concerns.
  13. D

    Need a NSDQBX -> BYX -> EDGA routing strategy.

    Release day is May 23rd.
  14. D

    Need a NSDQBX -> BYX -> EDGA routing strategy.

    Nope, sorry. However the upside of using BATS routing is that they do it in parallel, so you should not be concerned regarding liq disappearing. Check out ROBB on EDGA, that probably what you want, however I would trust BATS technology more. http://www.directedge.com/Portals/0/docs/Release...
  15. D

    Need a NSDQBX -> BYX -> EDGA routing strategy.

    TRIM Routing Strategy
  16. D

    I'm getting robbed by the SEC

    Well it goes down by 20% in 6 months.
  17. D

    Does IB screw you on MOC orders?

    The price is correct. Did you send it to ARCA or it was IB?
  18. D

    The exchange code 'D' (no one can exactly answer this ? 100%)

    That's right it's trade reporting on FINRA. EDGAX became exchanges recently.
Back
Top