Search results

You do not agree, you are being manipulative, dishonest, non-genuine, practically lying, not facing contrary evidence, ignoring the majority of the message and the relevant points. Psychopaths are the cause of war, do you include yourself in that class? Because by your own actions, you...

You are quoting the war mongering infanticide supporting anti-social behaviour promoting man as proof of what again? You know the quote. I gave it to you twice. You IGNORED it twice ... because any evidence that contradicts your pre-conveived opinion is not acceptable, not commented on, not...

More manipulative clearly unreasonable illogical garbage. There is ZERO proof that Santa Claus exists, there is ZERO relation to any known historical events. The complete opposite is true for scripture. Again, not just contradictions but explanations!

This is similar to my response. I could go look into this, I'm no scholar and it would be interesting to see. Before I do so though, I'm curious what the point is? Let's say there is no specific proof, what's the point being made? There are lots of historically very accurate documents that are...

Agreed. Let's remember that evolution is a THEORY. Not a myth. The story of the bible is another THEORY. Not a myth. There is mountains of evidence for its veracity. There is more evidence and stronger evidence than for a large majority of historical works that are never questioned. I am not...

More manipulative feces. Just because something says so does NOT mean it condones it. A surgeons manual talks about cutting someone's chest open, does that mean it condones murder? A survival story talks about eating human flesh to live, does that mean it condones the actions? Cmon mate...

I said this about you and offered proof. You only contradict. You aren't even able to form a coherent reasonable arguement. You don't even know the meaning of adhominem. Yes do this. Do this OBJECTIVELY. Not just examining sources that confirm your pre-coneived opinions like FT has. That will...

WOW! Ego much lately? Arrogance mean anything to you? Biased and obtuse are we? How about I tell you that YOU cannot process what I am saying. How about that. I won't look at your past posts and see that you speak intelligently. I won't do any investigation, I will ASSUME my views are correct...

More manipulative turds offered again out of context. I will keep saying it if you insist on doing it. This is PARTIALLY correct, DEPENDING on your definition of religion. Yes, it can be used as a tool to rule people. THAT IS NOT ITS INTENDED PURPOSE! Got it? Get it? Good. Like I just said in...

It doesn't matter, stop the distracting and avoiding. I said you had no idea HOW god goes about inspiring anyone, past or present, and that is still true. End of story.

More out of context manipulative feces. More you ignoring information that contradicts your pre-conceived ideas. More you repeating (in this case copying and pasting!) the ideas of someone else, being used as a tool, like a well trained monkey. You did not come up with that doing your own...

I called you nonsensical and I explain in detail. All you do is contradict. A contradiction is not an explanation. If my attitude is "wrong", please explain exactly but take into consideration everything I have said. I would LOVE to stop the nonsensical back and forth, it is up to YOU though...

Here's something new I asked but I think it got lost a few pages back: A hypothetical mechanical and discretionary strategy, both are similar with good results, decent ratios and other measures. Any faults can be traced to one aspect. Half the trades go in the wrong direction about 2 or 3...

Who are you to say this again? I could say the same to you, then what? Cmon. As for your analogy it is spurious at best. If you can come up with something just slightly relevant I'd be glad to answer. You're not comparing apples to oranges, you're comparing, uhmm, ok usually I'm better at this...

Martin you are being so defense instead of just admitting you are wrong. That's not usually expected from a trader. Anyhow. Yes I used the word "story". SO WHAT? That was followed by the words "this is real, this actually happened." You are trying to blame me for using a word instead of...

I know exactly where you are coming from. I mentioned exactly that already.

Here's something new: A hypothetical mechanical and discretionary strategy, both are similar with good results, decent ratios and other measures. Any faults can be traced to one aspect. Just over half the trades go in the wrong direction about 2 or 3 times the expected profit, sometimes the...

To be entirely honest, it's hard for me to answer because I don't know that much about prop firms. I have some reservations, but without more info I'd be assuming.

For exactly like I said, it's not an actual solution, it's out of frustration for being stuck. The point is to find a solution. I tried. I suggested something. I said that was ignored. Now you ignored my saying it was ignored. If what I suggest can't work, why? How to mold it? In what direction...

ROFLMAO! You, the most manipulative person I've seen in a while, are talking about intellectual honesty!?! Wow, again either it's on purpose are you are so blind that the only way to explain it is DSM-IV/V. You don't even know what intellectual honesty is. You wouldn't even be allowed into any...