Search results

yo epic or captain whatever i saw your post before you deleted it, you called me condescending but YOU were the one who started off with the "i thought it was clear stuff", if there is anything "condescending" after i pointed that out, please educate me, i re-read my message and can't see it...

Sorry, I thought it was pretty clear that some prop firms do not require a deposit. My bad for assuming that would be considered. Or is it? I also thought it clear that I was talking about futures prop vs retail NOT stocks prop vs retail. My bad. Or is it? Sorry, but when you start off saying "I...

I asked you to "show us one quote from the New Testament that IN CONTEXT promotes murder". Do you know what the word CONTEXT means, should we start there. Can you tell me what it means to quote something IN CONTEXT versus quoting something OUT OF CONTEXT, please. You already previously asked...

Try answering the question instead of avoiding it. The question was, do you believe something just because ONE one person says it is true?

LOL. You are funny. Either a robot or a personality disorder, I don't know what else to say. You go around and around in circles, I can explain, you don't listen, then you repeat the same thing just explained. Were you ever diagnosed with ADD or ODD? Anyhow, I'm not going to explain this time...

Thank you for the replies in this thread. All prop firms I've talked to want a deposit that I could just put in my own retail futures account. It seems there's no benefit, some have even said this to me straight out. Some have said they'd rather not take a percentage cut of my earnings since I...

Let me spell it out silly wabbit: A D H O M I N E M! Ad hominem. Understand?! The length of the post has ZERO association with anything, any lunatic knows that. You did nothing but IGNORE, maybe some avoidance, derailment, etc. Typical behaviours. Let me repost for your edification: Two...

So what do you make of all the scholars who are very intelligent, very articulate who disagree? How do you tell which OPINION is more true than the next, how do you personally already know if you are smarter than at least a few of these people put together? What do you make of all the...

I'm not as well versed in the specifics and that's fine for me right now. Let me ask though, do you believe just because ONE one person says something it is true? In EVERY FIELD there are academics who disagree. I can show you disagreements on something as basic as sugar or whether satellite...

If you want to keep displaying your blinding lack of intelligence that is up to you, but let me point out: I said ALL OF HISTORY and you replied about 0.00001% (being generous) of it, naming two people. That's it. Not even people. The point is even if it WAS a known real person, you mention...

The point is that it MIGHT be true, which is exactly what I said. There is VALUE in knowing what it says. As society moves forward and we learn more and more, knowing that gives you a greater context to analyze thing in. That is more the point. Again all you do is detract, avoid, attack, derail...

Do you apply this same standard for ALL history you accept as being true?

This is the problem athiests will have in deny the possibility that scripture might be true. Many other commonly accepted historical texts are based on more copies of copies than scripture, and are written by people further removed in time from the incident. The standards applies have to be...

Do you believe and accept in the concept of social darwinism and eugenics? I assume so but want to check.

Perhaps I'm wrong here but it seems like you have given yourself away, not a Freudian slip but similarly one can read into your words. There are two logical arguments presented, and you perceive or interpret one of them as being emotional. Why are they not both emotional, they both come from...

This is what I mean about failing tests of logic. This is like those games used to teach children "which one of these does not fit"? Did you forget the tooth fairy in your list?

Would this not depend on the standards of evidence used? Take a hypothetical, I can say there is no evidence anywhere period that life evolved from non-life so evolution is a myth just like scripture. It's all a myth, if you use the same standards of evidence. That is just that one example...

Let me go back a bit, this started with me saying "Absurdities like out of context manipulative half truths that only suit to deceive people of an accurate picture to then try and formulate an opinion out of" as a comment on how religion is portrayed by some people. I haven't been spouting...

LOL. Will you just make anything up?! LOL. No mad, not back peddling, just pointing out your toll-ish behaviour! More distract and evade in this reply. On and on you go, like the energizer monkey.

You are falling for his games. He's not here to actually be genuine and honest. The bottom line is that NEITHER creationism nor evolution is proven beyond question. FreeDumber is just about ASSUMING one position and defending it, without being objective. He wants to debate (win) not dialogue...