Search results

Sorry again ... just realized the idiocy of my previous post after re-(/actually)reading your problem. Don't have an answer for you other than maybe taking it back one step at a time to where you COULD transfer items across monitors, but not in the desired direction. Maybe try various new...

In Control Panel>Display there should be a monitor layout window where you can drag the monitors to whatever relative position you want. My graphics cards came with a program called Catalyst which does the same thing, and that's what I use to make any monitor adjustments. But my control panel...

No problem whatsoever. I like the easy ones.

80.75 10:23 EDT

Yep. I didn't think the breakout would go that far, and in fact it had enough gas for SPY to fill the gap (to the tick). So now I'm a little doubtful there's enough time for it to bounce all the way to new highs again, but you never know.

Wild guess ... b/o @ 84.00, fail, p/b to 81, then run to new HOD. Let's see how close we are.

SPY gap still not yet filled, up there @ 139.08.

Not only is it another day, it's a day after a huge drift up day ... likely some good chop for your method to thrive in. Hang in there man, on all fronts.

I have 89.75 for the 377 and about 96 for the 512 ... sound right?

On these kinds of days you can usually fade post-1pm breakouts for at least a 2-4pt scalp. Sometimes a 12:30 breakout is best.

My bad, I was looking at 86. :(

96.00 is the number, in case I missed someone mentioning it. fwiw, the corresponding YM # is 13048.

84.50 was R25 ... without a 5pt retrace anywhere.

It's coming off a 10-pt run (110.75-100.75), so we may see a retrace to 104-105 first, imho (if it can get through the hourly 200ema right here).

And yet channels and TL's based on time charts are very influential to the movements of CL. :)

Looks like if it's gonna happen they're waiting 'til the very last minute before giving longs their cookie.

Here's the question ... will the 58.75 shorts get their +10 before covering? ... +15? ... +20?

(Devil's advocate): Not true, you don't have to choose to own a car or drive one.

That would not be right imo. But what they should do is divide food stamps into produce and non-produce (simpy add a "P" to make a new voucher type), then convert say, 40% of a person's food stamp rations to "P-only". That way at least the government would be helping people stave off diseases...

All sorts of reasons why ES found support where it did. May be done pulling back for a rally through NFP. Edit: lol ... ok, news killed that theory. :eek: