Search results

Typical algo TICK storm there that usually represents the last gasp...

Agreed. And now they are trying to gun AAPL to get there. If that fails then SPX 1645 Held Bid will fall apart.

Here's what matters through September... http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/19/india-gold-imports-idUSL4N0GH1G820130819

Well you have price and you have upticks versus downticks so to avoid redundancy you need something showing volume breadth, either total volume or bid versus ask. Good luck.

Right back to the iceberg. I guess the GS and JPM algos are having a pissing contest over the DP.

Exit at NQ 75 into ES VWAP Test.

I posted the Iceberg and called the break on the ES. If that's not good enough for the OP or moderator then I am happy to egress. Who's the OP or moderator?

Again NDX 75 well defended will not hold NDX 80 Failed Offer.

NDX 80 still HO but NDX 75 feels defended so will exit NQ 76 to 73.

Actually one piece left for near VWAP or entry.

Exit 77 on Bid refills

NDX 80 HO so should get NQ 76 off here

Via NQ, exit at 76 then ahead of VWAP

Playing the break...

Iceberg defended the Daily Pivot after London Bond Close...

SPX 1625 Failed Bid will infer SPX 1600 to SPX 1550 in the Weekly and Daily chart to a very large audience. We shall see if there is Support...

You are right. I did not understand the focus of this thread. Now I do. Final post and my apologies.

Price did roughly the same thing around 0930 CT and 1030 CT in the 1m chart so nobody is going to understand "this way" with respect to why 12:14 CT is so different unless you enlighten us with a chart showing how the lines make more sense there.

Yes you can trade the NQ without watching the ES or the YM, especially during the morning. But in this case that was a HH in the current Session, unless you are referencing the level from 8/13 and calling it a Held Offer in the Daily or 300m chart.

But perhaps you are referencing the print on 8/13....