Search results

Peter 10, answer probably is NO, the only one which are "NO evaluation fee" are sort of "True prop" or in other words those Firms that are genuinely hunting for talent based on either education or exp. or those who fund others purely on "First loss " concept and are NOT in business of "...

If you are looking for a regulated exchange based product then CBOE Bitcoin futures in USA Note though the futures contract it is all in USD not actual crypto so min exposure could be high anything else check how regulated they are!

"I think what differentiates Axia education from the rest is the fact that the the educators use trading material from trades that are executed by the main traders." BUT the million dollar question with any such outfit is "do the educator's actually trade? If not and if there is no proof then...

777 spot on observation, that is the exact criticism leveled against all these companies because A) they do not disclose how many they really fund ( they dont have to but may be one day enough consumer's will wake up and demand or regulator's will rain in) B) Given technological advances it...

I beg to differ ( about such business doing more GOOD then harm) Ok this kind of business activity by these kind of firms increases awareness of trading for sure. So good for brokering and exchanges , however if the fundamental of business model is to make money on thousands of test fees and...

:thumbsup: add to that the new crop of "test fee based "prop" or testing firms on behalf of prop firms! 1000 pay test fee 5 get funded, very ethical o_O seems to be the real model but greed in us makes us ignore this fundamental , I am only loosing 200-400 for test! what do I care if thousands...

FXCM US was busted big way! Australian OTC brokers = no client money protection as compared to UK , check the fine print

Those "Dam regs" keep many scrupulous operator at bay.. think Binary scams from Israel! one final day the govt had to take action becasue it was maligning countries name!

I wont becasue it is an OTC , market maker model, not an exchange traded product Conflict of interest, If there was a TRUE P to P betting exchange lie www.betfair.com then I would consider it I believe people in UK do it only becasue of tax treatment! and ability to go short easily

sound like a DTTW "Trading floor" based in Canada! any experience with them one common factor "Unfortunately, trader2B was advised that proprietary traders in Quebec must be regulated by the AMF. Interesting opinion here https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/trader2b-remote-position.304195/page-2

how much is the training?

" I have to wonder why the US still doesn't protect traders' funds. They do if it is Stock brokers not Futures. Via SIPC I think $250,000 But yes UK is better becasue it protects Stock/ Futures/ OTC FX/CFD Reg whether to trade FX or ES is an individual choice If trading FX OTC FX is attractive...

If they are regulated in UK then UK regulators not SEC in USA!

I was referring to UK regulators (not brokers), they are supposed to treat all clients of a failed UK regulated brokers same!

When you say Aussie brokers you mean equity or OTC FX / CFD are you aware that in AUS regulations if a OTC broker goes belly up you the client becomes a creditor the ASG does not protect you , it only applies to Equity, In that regard UK FCA is better for traders Do search on Aussie while label...

If you are choosing which broker to use and in which jurisdiction This snapshot will tell a story Within the regulated space although there are huge differences Remember FXCM banned in USA one of toughest regulators Have a look, download the fact sheet if you like Interesting read...

"why is it relevant for the markets where the traders are located" you mean individual traders or the Firm on whose name the account is? at the end of the day any regulator would be concerns with who is playing in the market! I guess what matters is who the actual firm is and it's clearing...

So we either have very top level with reputation and regulated and needing college degree or those feeding on test fees or these ones who these seems to be based in very small jurisdictions and many don't even have company and street address! On top of that the SWIFT trade bad press Are there no...

h....m interesting sound like SWIFT trade or it new "Avatars" so how does this affect various "Trading floors" operating around the world on US exchanges also those companies overseas who are genuine trading firm NOT engaged in above mentioned activity

Apart from Bright ( which is reluctant to take non US clients) are there any reputable firms who offer leverage ( overnight) for Stock to Stock pairs trading and also offer training ( paid is ok but has to be specific for Pairs trading and there should be sufficient evidence that this firm...