Search results

Well, it looks like the true colours of the VN-bashing brigade are finally being revealed. First we had the pompous intellectualising of Arseimedes, now we've got the sniggering louts. What a pathetic bunch you are. And with that I bid you adieu...

Have you tested that? Let me answer for you, no you haven't. If you were actually to formulate this idea into a testable hypothesis, you would not need to be a giggling cynic. You would be someone who could judge the merit of trading ideas for himself.

Listen up dumbo. If you understood anything about markets you'd know that it's not always possible to pinpoint a move, but you can establish that the likelihood of a rally is strong at certain times, and that the probabilities favour the long side. That is what happened this week, hope you were...

One does wonder when it got 'off course', when Niederhoffer was being attacked or when he got defended. Seems to me like the latter.. Anyway, who cares. The good guys made a killing today.

Not once since 1997. And his returns since then have been phenominal.

I think there have been numerous fallacies posted here, basically through ignorance. Everyone has been going on about arrogance etc, but what does that mean in practice? All we've seen are sweeping generalities and assumptions based on partial information. And even the article has been largely...

Which will, of course, only apply to you and your cronies.

Atta boy! Cut your losses..

This patting yourselves on the back and claiming victory is hilarious. I have exposed your weaknesses, but you're too dumb to realize it. You just cling ever more to your fellowship.

It's fascinating the way you've gone into a huddle when threatened; the posturing and agreement amongst yourselves is hilarious. This is a serious psychological weakness for a trader, and I'm happy to tell you this because I know you won't be able to profit from it. The reason it won't help...

How very expected. As long as you agree amongst yourselves you're happy campers.

Who knows? It's called deception. Either you're really a pompous dogmatic fool or just pretending to be one. Have to say it's a really good act, if that's what it is.

Yet another one of those assumptions.. Seems that you believe everything you read, which might explain your own lack of achievement, Mr Covel or whoever you really are.

And just when the trend seemed to be going in favour of Archimedes, his unveiling as the trend-following and embittered Covel delivered a sudden and unexpected knockout punch...

The reason for Archimedes/ Mike Covel's vendetta: http://snipurl.com/rtju

I will do as you suggest and cut my lost time with this thread and venue.

Actually you don't know who I am, but this doesn't making a whole list of assumptions. Just the same as you are doing with Niederhoffer. And the fact that you have no respect for the achievements of others probably means you don't have any real ones of your own, apart from college that is. So...