Search results

So my # 3 was the correct solution but for other reasons than I thought. I feel that I don't have a good enough handle on the bands, yet and how and when to use them. Especially the table. Let's pretend I really was able to identify bar 78 as a P3P or EE. From this I don't see what links...

Doesn't look like! :D Good trades.

Because you said "just" the answer is: No!

"P stands for peak, T stands for through and WYSIWYG". Wow!!! Really!? :D Each bar (price and volume) has a name. WYSIWYG is only partially true. What we see is not only peaks and throughs. Bar 1 was an OB (in price). I assigned it a P1/T1 (in volume) but taking the previous bars into...

baro-san? Are you still thinking about the correct answer? Let me help you a little bit... Just because you see a Through doesn't mean you ASSIGN a Through. I hope this helps you finding the correct answer.

This means in my example? You would assign bar2 what? A T1?

You are inventing. There is no mention at this level yet about YM2M. If you only draw price channels then I could (maybe) agree with you. At this point we are only looking at price as a gate to measure volume.

Valid point and it was one of the areas where I had doubts. So how would you divide the volume of a OB? If it would be two separate bars, then I could clearly see the P1 and T1 level and could then compare it, in this case with bar2. The reason why I assigned it a P2 is based on the...

Hi Jack, does this look correct? First seven bars of today: Bar1 ---> OB ---->P1/T1----->PP4 Bar2 ---> XB ---->P2 ----> NA Bar3 ---> XB ---->P2 ----> NA Bar4 ---> XB ---->P2 ----> PP1a Bar5 ---> FTP ----> Wait Bar6 ---> OB ---->T2P/T2F ---->PP5a Bar7 ---> StichR ----> P3P ---> NA

:confused: :confused: :confused: I would be surprised if Jack or anybody else can understand your question. Please try to rephrase it. But based on your question I can deduce: You are not doing the MADA routine nor the volume test procedure. Instead you are inventing. :)

Let's see... Bar 63 ends the previous lateral which started at bar 59. Agree? Removing the gap between bar 63 and 64 it looks like bar 64 forms a FBP. Bar 65 is still in the boundaries/shadows of bar 63 so bar 65 in the log is "lat3". Do you agree?

Unfortunately they didn't tell you when and which market. ;-)

To get the discussion about volume test procedure started I quickly filled the first 18 bars of the log. I got stuck at bar 12 and decided to stop here in order not to delay the discussion. Why did I get stuck? This is what I did: I assume that until bar 10 the volume bars are assigned...

Hitch? Here my memory immediately reminds me of this: "...10 price cases...8 of them are internals..." What is the hitch?

Just continue. Looks "terrific" so far. Post questions if they come up in specific areas.

To be more precise... I mean the close of bar 29 is within the boundaries of bar 26.

This is a tricky one. On Jack's reference chart it looks like bar 29 is indeed treated/defined as a XR and not as lat4. But... if you look in his log for that day... and here I'm assuming I looked at the correct one... then there is no entry for a Lat3 or 4 or anything like "retro". It all...

Go to the "Drawing" menu. Scroll down to the bottom. There is "Copy Pattern".

You still need to re-read his instruction a few times. OB's are NOT "Wait" events. I repeat... never put "WAIT" for an OB. Only the second bar of "internals" where the volume of the second bar is not larger than the first bar. An OB gives you permission to use volume. It has two ends. So in...

Thanks for this!