Search results

It's obvious by most of the responses, people put very little thought into H&S formations anymore. I know I never did. It was too subjective for me. However, it seems when one attempts to find patterns to trade, they're better suited curb fitting there analysis with the trend. You'd probably...

That's silly, it's more of a normalization of the curve. You'd be better off saying their selling UST's while using dollars to buy weapons from Russia Either way, the argument is BS..JMHO

sell the rallies until econ data

This is the only call I will give you credit for. Good job ::p

If you MUST BE long this market, I'd expect a bounce off the lows this week, or, no later than after the June expiration. By then the "dip" should be in.

The Trend = Bullish :confused:

I didn't mention the federal debt because it is insignificant. It's just a nominal figure only useful for political campaigns in hopes of altering policy. The interest payment on debt in relation to national income is what matters, and that is not in danger in the least bit. The Gov. has no...

Ok, now You are being ridiculous. Of course I what the S&P 500 Futures are, that's my point exactly. I know every derivative instrument of the S&P 500 and any trader who trades index futures should know also. But, according to your logic, only the "little people" trade ES. Brilliant! And...

No offense sir, But how can you possibly make a market call, or give a recommendation on the S&P 500 without knowing what ES means? It negates the validity of your analysis even if you are right. JMO Anyone can guess, or listen to CNBC and hear them state how the S&P 500 is at, or...

Although, I like how Greenspan is calling this rally irrational exuberance, so maybe we have another 3 to 4 years to go before we really drop.

First time in awhile we've sold on good news (new homes sales). Front page of the WSJ talking about the bull market. Bob Pissonme calls it "just a breather". I don't know, When the Pom poms of CNBC get cocky I get nervous!

Yeah, I must admit, his Vegas calls have been pretty bad. Most recently, this past friday's call was suspiciously bad. But, then again, this is trading. What I don't understand however, is how could he lure people with good calls only to give bad calls later. Are you saying this is done on...

CATALYSTS! What has changed since last year? The Fed is ALWAYS an issue, and how can you have an oil market without Iran/Iraq Geo-politics? It's the only "THREAT" that gives instant volatility to that market, or the economy for that matter. Without it, why trade. It would be the slowest market...

That was a good read Stealth Trader. You make some valid points.

That's what I was thinking but I wasn't sure.

But, I still don't see why people would pay for his service as it stands now, assuming it is reliable. His entry points for the most part are simply enough to identify on your own. And I don't think his recommendations are that important. But, is there something else he provides worthy of a fee...

I still think Oscar is legit. I am merely exploring the possibility that he may have an alter motive. It's a fair question. Like I said, I noticed the misprints before and didn't think much of them. There was an occasion last week where he told traders to "go to market" @1495.50 yet, futures...

LOL..That was well written it sounds poetic. So what do you think Oscar's angle might be? I've noticed "these misprints" also but didn't think much of it. However, it does bring up very interesting speculation and suspicion .IMO. What I don't understand though, is; his trade rec. don't seem...

Is it me, or does this forum seem suspiciously bearish tonight? What gives?..I have NO idea where it's going tomorrow. It just seems as if more people are calling for a top, or a correction of x%. While others seem more drastic calling for out right crashes in the near term. WHY? :cool: