Search results

I remember years ago removing for example couple of x86 32bits floating point instructions from loops that goes around 1 symbol( some intraday 10 years back data, or something like that ).. And having a speed improvement of +20%. I'm backing what I'm saying with facts and personal experience...

Deltix: <= .NET and Java :eek: I'm not very familiar with Streambase, but it looks a very solid product. I look around their website. Do they compile user written code to 64 bit native code?

Amibroker is a good product. But we are not building an Amibroker. They announced their 64 bit version a century ago. But I don't know anybody that uses it.( I may be wrong about this ) I'm gonna make this clear: .NET ONLY helps the companies that develop platforms due to all the tools...

While I'm not bind to any non-compete. I prefer not to reveal any personal information because I worked several years in the industry and I don't want to hint anybody. No website for this project yet. You are free to email me if you have more questions.

That's not the challenge. The challenge is executing code on every time a tick comes in. Some of the issues: -code can do looping and re-calculation -code don't use all the cores( almost 99% of the platforms today ) -code call other things, directly or indirectly...like dlls that you have...

These were Microsoft selling points when they came out with .NET around 2001/2002…. I used to belive it at the time…look… here you are mentioning Pentium 4. I had my last P4 computer was around 10yrs ago… these are all pure selling points from Microsoft. They were really scare with...

Hi Lee, Thanks for the comments. Of course it is "for sale" : ) It is not clear to me what you said. But the point is that user strategies can run on the client computer and on the server. We are coming with a big library of strategies/programs and can be used as reference. It is impossible...

I can tell you that no .NET will be faster than for example TS EL. EL is compiled into 32bit assembler. Saying that: no .NET can compete there. I'm pretty sure ppl are most amazed about their speed more than yours. And some of these ppl are/were company owners trying to replicate TS EL speed...

ScoobyStoo, Sorry, but your comments are incorrect. .NET compilers outputs IL(you could call it bytecode if you are not very technical). Java compilers compile into ByteCode too. Jitters compile ByteCode into assembler. Jitters don't produce ByteCode. So right of the bat, everything you...

Hi Runningbear, I'm not sure what is your experience. I came here to look for recommendations and ideas about most-have features that no one is offering, I'm most interested in these features that most platform dev. companies deem "impossible" to develop with the current technology. I...

Hi guys, I'm building a trading platform that will shake things around. At his moment I'm working on the back-testing part. Why another platform??? ....because I know where the lacking in the industry is! Here are some of the features: -User written programs/strategies can run on the...

Hi guys, I'm building a trading platform that will shake things around. At his moment I'm working on the back-testing part. Why another platform??? ....because I know where the lacking in the industry is! Here are some of the features: -User written programs/strategies can run on...