Search results

The EU solution is a bit more complicates than that, of course, the governments will buy preferred stock of banks with this money and also receive a return on the invested money and also may place people on their boards to make sure that lending is directed towards corporations and people that...

Ad hominen attacks is a clear sign of mental weakness and an indication of a psychotic individual. You have made any valid point, you are attacking economic theories without understanding them and you offer no sound alternatives. In other words, I repeat, you exhibit a psychotic behavior.

I asked mccd this question. The EU solution is to give money directly to the banks to lend. They think the liquidity trap may be bypassed this way because banks won't have problems to lend money at a nominal interest rate below inflation rate.

Meaning what? Be specific pls.

Are you psychotic? I don't even know who's stock_turder. I started getting the impression that all you desire is for the economy to be destroyed, for your own psychotic reasons. That won't happen...and yes, building a bridge requires real work and it's a productive job, unlike posting crap...

Don't worry. As deflation happens, the money printed and spent in the economy will be much less than the amount of debt money created by the banks before the crisis started. Whatever happens to the money unless taken out of the country will stay in circulation and increase consumption. No...

What's you sample size to claim statistical significance of the result? 1,2 or just 3 at max occasions? Are you willing to pay for your lack of statistical significance? Philosophy is nice and good until the bill arrives.

A lot of money is flowing to bond funds and away from equity and gedge funds. Bonds is the next bubble.

What do you think about the EU solution to give money directly to the banks to lend? The liquidity trap may be bypassed this way because banks won't have problems to lend money at a nominal interest rate below inflation rate, assuming of course, there as borrowers around.

You do not understand economics. The word "highway" is used to mean general infrastructure projects which are very useful to society and productivity increase and can stimulate future growth. I think you ought to visit your local priest and confess your ignorance.

If you're looking for the truth go to your local priest. He did a very good job explaining to truth seekers like you what options are there.

You got no choice. Otherwise you will go into negative interest rates and hyperinflation. Government is no bad thing if it does what is supposed to do. Negative interest rates is a bad thing regardless. Your choice....

One of the best posts. Thanks.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adn9kI2m2.GU&refer=home

This is more of a philosophical school that examines the causes of events and has never AFAIK presented any quantitative way of dealing with issues and that is why it has no valauble publications to offer in journals.

I think it is fair that those who say Keynesian economics is dead or stupid to state their suggestion for an alternative at this point as related to this crisis.

selection bias....

Can you explain a bit more how this scheme works out? Do they drive the price of illiquide stocks up? What about the insiders? They stay put and don't sell to take advantage of the stock going up?

IMO, he means exactly that, exit strategies that allow you to know the exit price in advance, otherwise the risk is indefined and position size cannot be calculated. I think he mentions this earlier in the paper too. For example, a fixed nnumber of points or pips in the case of forex trading...

What you have done in going from 1 to 3 was to add an additional condition to reduce the number of losing trades and increase the win rate. At the same time, you have also reduced the winning trades. The ultimate difference between the two systems is their statistical significance. Probably...