Search results

Dead again? No quotes...

Good job, thanks a lot...

Me too, out of curiousity...

Actually, what does it mean a 'long period of time'? How long? Conveniently long that you can at some point declare that you are right? Right now I can say that you are wrong (the system is making money), but when the system is in a drawdown you might be saying that the system is losing, so we...

Well, some of us still need them for trading, but obviously I cannot speak for all ET members. :D :D I agree, good job sidinuk! Now, if we could also get the control sheets for other markets similar to the control sheet for YM, that would really be great. Don't forget that this is the lazy...

And so no wonder that these people are in the business of selling their crapware and not trading it...

That is the problem here as some of us noticed it already too. Catching phrases such as 'there are no secrets in the markets' are nice, but the reality is dirty and hiding it beyond the facade of catchy phrases gets you nowhere... The demand and supply will catch with you sooner or later...

Everything has its market value, all it takes to find it out is to put your system on the market and set a price that you would then adjust accordingly to the demand or you can keep it fixed if you do not care about liquidity...:)

That's too simplistic. There are some limitations determined by the law of demand and supply that would make some systems less efficient if they are widely followed. I already mentioned some of them that I actually use.

Good challenge. I definitely would not because my systems use limit orders for entries/exits so I am not interested in competing with other folks for fills.

Good points, same with systems that use limit orders for entries/exits. The law of demand and supply is against you if you reveal your system as then you will have to compete with some more crowd to get a fill at your limit price. But for liquid markets this is less of an issue although not to...

He probably means some other system, meant originally for ER2, the ORB type of system and not the system that was originally presented for YM in the thread 'Example Trading System'. The latter has been doing very well in February and had a small loss in January...

This was already discussed in this thread: there are no reversals, one trade a day only according to the original method...

I don't think there was really any thread as I might have killed it before it even started. My advice is though still the same: always ask for a track record or insist on seeing the guy trade live before you ever make any decision to buy his stuff...

That site was already mentioned here, by, big surprise, another low count poster like yourself. Ask the guy about his track record and you will see how good he is. I believe he sucks and so no wonder he is peddling this stuff.

Finally some words worth quoting...

I follow mostly YM and ES these days, can't say what ER2 dynamics is these days. Was great in the past, perhaps it still is.

I believe this is a sound way to do, that is, as you say, until it stops working. But I would use both systems, one without the Thursdays excluded and the other one as in the original work. The main problem I see with this system as applied to YM right now is not the Thursday problem. The...

Probably only 30 and I guess only the daily sesssion data and, correct me if I am wrong, cut off at 4 PM for YM, that is if they use the free Quote.com data feed.

Nice graffitti. I guess that explains why fund managers like it so much...:D :D