Search results

..."much more".. ask CME for the costs ;)

With this one, maximum DD is assured! :) http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/swimsuit/video/0901.body-painting.irina-shayk/model/irina_shayk/index.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgmwGKGecXM

oh, no!... how could you think something like that? just a system fault or bad finger :D

...but you're as good as your last trade ;)

Any issues occurred to these brokers after May 6 crash?

Kathy last november posted the near sure-thing that with EURUSD @ 1.50xxx there was a good probability of * not losing big figures at least * giving the previous ten years seasonal.... But ..oops! Dubai thing occurred a few weeks later...

Thank you maxima120, for your clarification. :)

That's clear, thanks. Let's talk about trailing stops, if any. Now let's suppose the price goes up -yes - but until 119 level: at this price there is no add a and no new +20% target. The issue is a retracement begins back to.... 95. stop is hit. Does it make sense to close the position...

Ok, thanks for your interpretation duhmentor; I did not catch that meaning. Another point: >>Want to increase your profits. Pyramid at each level when you hit your target and change stops and targets.>> Clearly you want to be larger when your're right but at the same time, not to have...

X_Charts is included with X_Trader for example. Clearly it's just a charting module, you may like it or not.

ok thanks Proflogic. What about backtesting features on bid/ask volume historical data serie with MC in order to evaluate CVD indicators?

Is TS or MC able to test correctly historical data against bid/ask volume in order to calculate cumulative volume data indicators?

bonem thanks for you reply....if we consider a 'L' move, this seems talking about the (long) losers being forced to liquidate their positions as long as they're realizing that the previous prices/range show an improbable bounce back, i.e. new prices becoming more accepted over time, (until all...

bone, what's the measure, i.e. what's represents the 'order flow' in your examples?

In XP usually the Peak allocated memory can be compared with the Total Physical Memory; if the peak is near or larger to the Total RAM it's clearly better to upgrade. Under Vista-related OSes where is the Peak value? :confused: In Vista x64, I often see 10/15 MB of Free Physical Memory...

Thanks for the detailed explanation; this means that even the 'slow' x1 PCI-Ex videocard will be usually faster than a fast old-stile PCI card? :confused:

Thank you!

You have a weblink or they are your tests? In this case, could you please run the 2D tests - All only?

Why LCD on DVI should be better vs. LCD via VGA ports on our eyes?