Search results

Well... Let me give it a try... Hopefully I set it up right...! P(A given B) = .80*.01/.80*.1+.096*.99 P(A given B) = .008/.008+.09504 P(A given B) = .008/.10304 P(A given B) = .0776 OR 7.76% The probability that a woman given a mammography actually has breast cancer is 7.76 %.

Well I must admit that you have me baffled...:confused: Baye's Theorem is usually used to figure out if a "test" is accurate or not. I think some computer programmers use it as well but I don't do that. I can't figure out what it has in common with trading...? Any chances you...

Diesel engines have other problems than gasoline engines. For starters fungus can grow in your fuel tank. Sludge will clog your filters etc... You need extra maintanance on a diesel engine that you wouldn't get on a gasoline engine. You can check this out...

Neaahhh... You can believe whatever you want. But we have a right to point out that some stuff just doesn't make sense. We also have a right to not believe what you believe in. Well science evolves and changes... It admits when something is wrong. See the evolution of the scientific...

:D Is this guy for real...? Apparently, most people think that he rants for entertainment purposes only...:p :confused: There will be a Palestine regardless of what the US says. I think that they've already figured out that they don't need the permission of the US or of the UN to...

O.K. ... Where does it say in the Bible that you have to defend Christians...? As Christians weren't around when The Old Testament was written...? As a Christian no one has to defend Israel... Eitherway, I'm more of an atheist. Overall, you're either nuts or doing this for...

Huh... Baye's Theorem...?! Well now you've given me something to think about. I haven't read the entire thread... Do you apply this to trading...? Good portrait... :)

That's what all the physicits said when Relativity came around...! :D This sort of thing happens from time to time but it is still a little to early to claim that the results will have that effect.

First time I've seen him... His kind of ranting just pushes my buttons that's all.

That's a good idea... If you get lucky and pick three magic beans then by all means use your remaining choices to pick from the second bag. This does in fact increase your chances but it is a special case as it is dependant on first picking your 3 magic beans and on how many picks you still...

It doesn't... The fact that they're in two different bags makes no difference. You're looking at the sample size. You can spill both bags out unto the floor and pick beans blindfolded. The result will be the same.

Thanks...! :)

Yeah.. But they're doing O.K.!:D

Well God didn't chose me so fuck his chosen people. Actually, fuck the entire Middle East. You can suck me sideways... We ain't fighting in that war shithead. You think the average American has nothing better to do with their time than fight wars for Israel...?

:D :D :D You can't do any better because your sample space has doubled. Bag 1 P(x) = 3/10 Bag 2 P(x) = 3/10 You have 10/10 (100 %) chances to pick 3 beans if you just focus on 1 bag... If you focus on 2 bags combined then you have P(x) = 6/20 = 3/10. :D However, your prob. of...

Well yeah they say that in the article but they should give it in actual speed measurement that everyone can understand... According to same Wiki source... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino I'll try and do a metric calculation and hopefully I get it right... :D Speed of Light...

I think everyone might be wondering why neutrinos can go faster than light (besides experimental error)... Here is a theory... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino Personally, I hope the results hold up to further scrutiny...

It made a lot of headlines... According to your source... http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/09/23/faster-than-light-neutrinos/ Fermilabs also noticed the same thing... CERN gives a 6 sigma (Standard Deviation) to the event so it isn't a small statistical...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/22/us-science-light-idUSTRE78L4FH20110922

That's true as well... BTW... Anderson Silva is a circus freak...! True pound for pound the best in the UFC, with the best record in the UFC, 14 straight wins. The best record in MMA goes to Fedor "The last Emperor" Emelianenko with 26 straight wins (one being a no contest, so you can...