Search results

Thank you Jack for continuing this discussion. At the outset let me say to all that there is no claim on my part to have found a better way to assimilate what has been presented in the JHT nor should my remarks of last evening be misconstrued in such a way as to imply that I believe that...

Thank you R/R. Catch you tomorrow. lj

Look at the Spyder chart I posted today nkhoi and note that P1 of the traverse is the P3 of the channel. What you refer to is not the same, IMO. lj

Gooch, The starting point for the traverse and the channel are not the same. lj

Thank you Jack for your interest. You are quite correct when you say that we do not share a common view on the utility of rhetorical questions or process learning. With respect to assembling a set of rules let me say this. We have recently been talking about the discussion Spyder had with...

I hear what you are saying guava but what I was trying to get at here was what did the two traverses have in common which made them traverses and also what was it that made the second traverse, a traverse and not a channel. So let me split this up and take the second part first. What I am...

That's why I mentioned the slope. If it goes negative then you would HAVE to have a tape break. What R/R seemed to be saying, I don't know if that it what he was saying and hence the question, was that you could fan as long as the trend was still going up. So maybe a lower high but higher low...

Hi R/R, Thank you for your comments. They have been very helpful. I have several questions. It would seem reasonable that in order to have an accelerated tape you must first have a tape to which the accelerated tape can be compared. So you just can't start out with an accelerated...

There is a great chart of Spyder's on 10-31-08 which illustrates this point and several others. lj

Can anyone tell me why one of these is a traverse and one is a channel? The trivial answer that the traverse is completing a downchannel does not address the real reason but merely states the obvious. This isn't a quiz or a rhetorical question, simply because I don't know the answer. This was...

Thank you for sharing Neoxx. lj

Yes, well, hmmm. Mental contortions would most assuredly be a euphemism but there is this useful carry-over thingy and there are also other ways to deal with the gap, especially the 'wrong-footed' type, which ways I am availing myself of these days. The notion of using the Globex has been...

On further reflection that one also falls short, so like romanus, I'm packing it in for a while. lj

Best guess and if anyone has something better please shoot this one down. Yesterday had to be one of those frickin' traverses which became a completed downchannel which makes the pace acceleration at EOD yesterday a true peak volume signal (and not a P2 search signal) then an uptraverse this...

It has little to do with philosophy and all to do with recognizing and correcting an annotation error. lj

I see that nkhoi but it doesn't clarify the matter. lj

Let me freely admit that this AM's up move has resulted in a bout of head-scratching. Herein lies the benefit of Mr. Black's method of starting the day fresh. If yesterday's analysis, by a number of people, was correct then how does one rationalize today's chart? This is a question not a...

Charts 'rendering' of my trace is an example of the fact that there is more than one way to express one's understanding of this method. I have no idea what he's doing but that means nothing. If he gets results from how he thinks then good for him. The point being that one does not have to...

Thank you for your opinion. lj