Search results

Th This has nothing to do with regulation. It is scam because you are never going to profit unless you are lucky or you can beat the robots of the platform.

This is the most idiotic post on ET ever. I think the poster may want to rephrase.

Machine learning was in fashion in the late 1980s when I was in graduate school. I remember professsors thinking that they will become too rich with ML.When they lost their money they got around understanding that its principles apply to problems that require curve-fitting, which is exactly the...

Yes, you can buy one EURUSD lot with 100K balance in your account and you have 1:1 leverage. People are confused about it. You can buy one E-mini in an account with balance equal to face value and you will be 1:1 leveraged. See this expert article for details.

Real or paper?

Waitng for black swans to happen loses more in the longer-term than it wins in the short-term unless you are lucky, take the money and retire.

Gambler's fallacy, RSI Use at your own risk.

It depends on the period of the indicator and the timeframe.

Time lag in network connections, data filters, buffer delays in fact markets. In addition all forex broker show different data.

So we save him some trouble looking for the software.

Jem, check out his new Momersion indicator. P.S. Actually I thought he meant that the patterns were random, not the price action. Since he talks about +autocorr he could not have meant that price was random.

He is looking for a casino.:) Retail forex is mostly scam.

Correlation is useless.

If your method works use market orders.

The proper question to ask is what would have happened without QE.

If you want to spend some money for entertainment purposes then it is fine to trade forex but do not expect to make easy money in a zero-sum game controlled by market makers. You may read this for more info.

They also do not know statistics

Excellent platform.

All debt is not the same. There is good and bad debt. Good debt is when it is used for growth. Bad is when it is used to pay public service workers.

A genetically optimized system for a glabal maximum will almost always be robust to small changes in parameters and the test may fool you. See relevant links Fooled by machine learning Benferroni correction If you do optimization you essentionally do many multiple comparisons and effectively...