Search results

so how about this rule about being nice to people?? doesn't work any more??

how's that relevant here ?? the mere fact that somebody's been trading for ages doesn't mean he is profitable .. my first ten years - let's just say I was donating Mr Simons .. still no idea how the year 's going to end.. as to the waves and Gann and all that tune - it's safe to assume ALL IS...

'Be nice to people before they have a chance to behave badly' - doesn't it sound a bit like a threat ?? hey, Mr Double , how's your doubling coming?? / hope it was nice/ ;)

crystal clear you have an edge :) just give up, best you can do.. but I know you won't :) funny how you get into this teaching manner - how one has to be careful on certain days.. give up, I'm telling you..

Mr double doubles..Personally, I don't find that surprising.. Who would ?? :)

so no such thing as the current bid & ask ? we all trade past prices? it's a bit like saying there is no future it's only past and that would exclude us all from the now :)

seems like there is a number of people in the society who fall for such vagueness .. they are attracted to it somehow and this number looks CONSTANT .. why not take advantage of that? from my own experience I know women find this approach attractive and guys who apply it are considered to be...

by stating the obvious MG thinks he is exceptional :) hey, MG , tell us sth we don't know.. how about oxygen?? tell us how important it is for keeping us alive:)

cheap pose indeed .. history,literature and personal experience / dealing with terminal cases/ hardly confirm it .. if it were true / in your case impossible to validate at the moment / you would be a statistically significant exception that I wouldn't bet on .. why pose ? because you don't...

first time I see a chart with a 100% predictive power ! thanks a bunch ,bro ;)

I know you will hate me for saying that but do you really think this journal deserves 5 stars?? A bunch of rotating traders some of whom show real time entries , others showing levels or writing not testable comments, win some, lose some type of thing.. Each of you could start his own journal...

it's great how you do what you love and money follows :) 500 /five hundred/ more trades and I'll be your fan :D will you promise to be here for that long ? because if not then no point following this somewhat concise journal ..

funny word : 'SIMPLICITY' good Lord only knows what it means:confused: let alone SIMPLICITY in TA :) so, yes! I'd say simplicity is important! why not.. at least what's 'simple' should be easily tested.. or you mean simplicity but the one that can't be tested??:confused: then it's not...

so nLepwa and Maestro are lying??:confused: I thought they were proponents of randomness in the markets but it's also possible that I misunderstood them.. now , suppose they trade as they claim / they bet on randomness/ would they still profit when we take into account what's being discussed...

95% of the 1%.. except 95 is derived out of someone's ass probably as no study hasn't been presented as of yet...

acc. to the newest presented study - aim at 0.3% a day after costs, you will then belong to the famous 1% :) / see " career" section here /..

either a strategy is OBJECTIVE AND TESTABLE or ... it isn't and that's where all the BS begins..

might be the lack of edge as well.. try reading 'Evidence based technical analysis' as a cure..

one more thing - this 1 % .. would that be a proof that markets are not random??

that's why swing traders and long term traders are perceived as likely to be more profitable than day traders which probably is only a matter of 'focus' - give them enough ' frequency' and the statistics will look the same.. yeah, whatever.. good thing is we all win here and that's what really...