Search results

yeah your style is different than mine, but trading more long bias side with proper risk management was the correct call last week and this week. Even after this move today, if I was forced to only take one side, it would still be long. It's been incredibly easy to get trapped short...

@Laissez Faire Did you also get a short here on ES? 5325 was "eligible" for me to short but given time of day I didn't take it. Just curious if that's something you'd consider or too small of a time frame you?

Yeah, I understand. I agreed with that in the other post. I was just saying the 18759 off script did not matter. That's a setup that typically completes regardless of context. Taking profits was great, that's what I did as well (given context / off script) that's why I was trailing and...

5332 is eligible means reversion on the high side in this scenario, but today was a little weird as you mentioned so I am with you on taking profits, just posted i went 100% flat too. 5328 was the bottom side target for me. the 18759 was good regardless of context, but nice job on taking...

ES can 5332 if we get ack above 5328.00 running out of time, but not surprising if ES goes there. I am 100% flat though not going to re-enter.

Ok 100% flat everything now. that's good enough.

Mission completed. Flat I have runners on evalution, but flat on earning account.

I gave wrong level it's actually higher at 18759.50 be still will look to trail profits now

below 18726.00 ill be out though. not going to give any gains back and be stubborn incase we don't fill in 18751 ish

fair enough it isn't off script for me the overall day doesnt matter 18751 was made in a way that is unattural to describe it best it's rare we don't fill it in. Did not expect that dip prior though, but i took advantage of it.

i bought that dip have a runner trailing looking for 18751

NQ normally going to 751 at least typically, beyond that not sure. this is all head fakes down though until 751. current price 18725

lol man really? this forum has no direct relation or correlation as far as taking my individual trading serious or not. wow that is some incredibly bad logic. iam sure you didn't, but did you ever think of the other possibility? that based on the replies I received AND based on reviewing...

barely anyone does what they are suppose to do to begin with yet people talking about boogey man algo's. it isn't stopping you from being profitable, not even close. people need to to put together a logical trading strategy and actually commit to following it, that's what's stopping most...

i love it. meet in person? no talk on voice no? trade real time ? definitely no! Oh maybe u do a journal with text!?!? yeah!!! now ur talking nonpln thats so awesome type out an online journal instead of actually accomplishing something!! ffs lol

sure i can but what is the purpose? is your time so worthless that you just do things without a purpose? it still hasnt occured to you for even one second that maybe iam actually serious and what i am saying is legit?

this is the biggest load of crap and you're wasting your time if you believe any of it. someone or something is always making a mistake in the market, don't be the first one to jump. wait for the mistake, identify it and attack.

well in some respects yes, but also in others that is just dumb and disrespecting yourself. look how many people flailing in the wind on these boards, suggesting and looking into strategies that are overly complicated and have no inherent edge. other people are here for social hour it seems...

I found some of the replies amusing, but at this point it's boring. I mean outside of the rewards, trading is super boring now too. There's no longer any mystery left in the markets. Maybe that's why so many people here troll and could care less if I do or don't have something...

I have to ask what does it even matter. if I post consistent results for 2 months with pay outs are you going to assist me? Could care less making a journal just to prove that you aren't as good as a judge of talent as you think.