Search results

  1. dom993

    CL151

    Update re. the CL151 Market-Model statistics. The first table is the trend-count on a monthly basis – I have highlighted in yellow the months below 100, as you can see there was a severe decline in trend-count starting in November 2013, with 4 months in 2014 down to the 50-60 range (May to...
  2. dom993

    CL151

    Results for the week ending November 7, 2014: - BasicTM: 2 wins ; 1 BE ; 1 (max) loss ; net -320 - AlternateTM : 1 wins ; 1 BE ; 2 losses (incl. 1 max loss) ; net -680 Max-loss trade on Wednesday was pretty upsetting, as price moved 2-ticks beyond our stop, then turned around and made a...
  3. dom993

    CL151

    Results for the week ending October 31, 2014: - BasicTM: 3 losses ; net -745 - AlternateTM : 3 losses ; net -745 Last trade of the week was certainly frustrating, coming twice 1-tick (1/2h apart) from securing a win.
  4. dom993

    If you had to trade based on this chart, what would it be?

    I use NinjaTrader to develop strategies which sole purpose are to collect data (extracted from historical data) into .CSV files, that I analyze in Excel. I have a webinar on my website (in the middle of the systems page) and a couple more in the NinjaTrader 3rd-party add-on channel on YouTube...
  5. dom993

    If you had to trade based on this chart, what would it be?

    A single chart / trade setup won't tell you anything ... whether you go long or short, the outcome of that particular trade is a random event. If you analyze thousand of similar setups, you might find that there is a bias towards long or short ... this will give you an edge if you are going to...
  6. dom993

    Would you trade this system?

    Backtest same year on EUR futures (6E), use 1-tick slippage for entries and for exits, $5 comms per contract per trade. This will give you a better idea.
  7. dom993

    CL151

    Results for the week ending October 24, 2014: - BasicTM: 1 win ; 2 losses ; net -435 - AlternateTM : 1 win ; 2 losses ; net -985
  8. dom993

    Language comparison

    IMO, profitable trading strategies are far more complex than the example you want to use for comparison purpose. I can clearly articulate the merits of using C# (NinjaTrader) ... C# is one of the best OO languages, it is relatively easy to create trading software components reusable across a...
  9. dom993

    CL151

    Results for the week ending October 17, 2014: - BasicTM: 4 win ; 1 loss ; net +1785 - AlternateTM : 2 win ; 1 loss ; net +2725 BasicTM account still in DD (-1290 vs June 12 P&L peak) AlternateTM account made 2 new P&L peak for this system this week (+2050 vs August-13 prior P&L peak).
  10. dom993

    What is better for Charting and Backtesting - MultiCharts or Ninja

    In terms of complexity, this particular example would be extremely easy to program, I would say max 10 lines more for the suggested approach, vs. using a single timeframe with CalculateOnBarClose=false (which we both know cannot be backtested in NT7 - it will be possible to backtest in NT8, but...
  11. dom993

    What is better for Charting and Backtesting - MultiCharts or Ninja

    Here is how I would address your example: - main TF : 5-min per your example - second TF : 1-sec TF ... used for order-fills, & real-time trading actions On the main TF, on bar close, you make the decision to go Long at market on a print 5-tick below that bar low. Keep track of that decision &...
  12. dom993

    What is better for Charting and Backtesting - MultiCharts or Ninja

    In general, the concept of price-bar is used to summarize price-action on a given "interval". Using price-bars of a given interval implicitly assumes you don't need the inner details of price-action, else you choose a smaller "interval". Assuming you have made the right choice of "interval"...
  13. dom993

    What is better for Charting and Backtesting - MultiCharts or Ninja

    You are somewhat unfair to NT backtesting abilities ... it is always possible to submit your orders to a 1-tick or 1-sec timeframe (I prefer the later, less memory requirements and actually better simulation of transmission delay to the exchange), which makes your backtests results as accurate...
  14. dom993

    over 90% win rate

    I have one of these, although currently in prototype form. Not sure I like it though ... the average loss being 2.5 x the average win, it doesn't take long to get into a significant DD, and then, it can take a long time to get out of it.
  15. dom993

    The Backtest Results Thread

    20 trades in 20 years ... does it sound like there is some possibility of over-fit?
  16. dom993

    CL151

    Results for the week ending October 10, 2014: - BasicTM: 2 win ; 1 loss ; net +315 - AlternateTM : 2 win; 1 loss ; net +485
  17. dom993

    Backtesting software ideas

    Something went wrong with the quote ... I am not the author of anything you quoted
  18. dom993

    Backtesting software ideas

    I have a webinar on my website on the systems page, in which I describe the market-model used by CL151, and how I used it to identify & qualify "pattern 151". You can also search for the webinar I did in July with NinjaTrader, it is in the NinjaTrader add-ons partners channel on YouTube. This...
  19. dom993

    Backtesting software ideas

    cj: you are giving me too much credit on the stats side - I don't use anything beyond the basics, and I have no idea what k-fold cross validation is about :) ... ... on the other hand, you might not be paying enough attention to the market-model side
  20. dom993

    Can your broker follow you if you get good results?

    2+1 weeks ... do you think this makes a significant sample size? how much backtest have you done, and what is the worst performance decline in 1 week from the prior 2 weeks? You just started trading that system, and think after 2 weeks of good performance your broker or a broker`s employee...
Back
Top