Search results

In your entry: 714: 1:51:11 / 1:51:17 716: 1:46:46 / 1:51:16 717: 1:14:36 / 1:51:11 If sorting by closing time, then 1:51:11 should be 714 1:51:17 should be 717 There are other similar discrepancies like this, not sure what happened there.

Intrigued, I was looking for something that would be conflicted with each other. The above three entries: order # is inverse to the times of entry /exit. That is pretty odd. order # is generated by brokerage, and should be numbered according to trade time sequentially. Any explanations? 714...

One thing that is fishy: if someone can consistently generate such 100% profitable trades over a lengthy period of time and 10K trades with confidence, why don't you scale it up to make millions easily?

A magnificent computing skill, I would say.

You suggested he keeps an open trade after 100 days? When I looked through all his trades so far, only a few trades were sold within a week, 99% were out within the same day.

I analyzed some of these trades and it occurs to me that it is unlikely to generate these intertwined trades by hand to gain a small profits consistently within such thousands of transactions, so it is more likely to program it to catch small or tiny profits for each trade, but again, it is...

He is showing both sides for each trade, buy side and sell side, both with time and price. What is the other side you are talkin about?

He is transparent about his entry time and price, and exit time and price as well for each trade, what more transparent you ask for?

He is showing all these consecutive trading on entry (time stamp and price) and exit (time stamp and price), what is the lying you are accusing him about?

It looks like it is automatic trading, as you can not trade every hour of the day manually (unless you have someone to trade in shifts); In this way, it is rather a demonstration of super programming capacity rather than discipline though.

Last time before the Fed minute, I bought 5 CALL and 5 PUT options of SPY at the same price level, each costed about the same (5X$500=$2500) and I expected a big swing in one direction. So the result was the CALL option came to zero, but the PUT was worth at $7500, so a gain of $2500 (deduct the...

Today's action reminds of somebody saying: it is not the news that matters, it is the market reaction to the news that matters.

Did you get any Memo today? It looks like the big boys have planned it.

Less than one month to make 110 millions, not bad. It would make a lot of smart stock guru of trading 30 or 40 years really mad; on the other hand, not sure this kid has real talent or just a huge fortune. The kid looks smart and interned at a hedge fund. Curious question: how much he personally...

Not sure when he bought the stock, if he did it before July 26 with average price of 5.5, at one point he would lost about 4 millions on paper (5.5 to 4.6 on July 26). Anyway, people can stomach such paper loss must have a huge fortune to back up.

University student makes $110mn trading meme stock favourite Bed Bath & Beyond Antoine Gara and Madison Darbyshire in New York Thu, August 18, 2022 at 11:37 AM In this article: BBBY -22.83% A 20-year-old university student has made a roughly $110mn gain by selling a stake in...

The P/E is 1800 at current price. If using some of the high P/E like Amzn or TSLA (100-120) to gauge, HKD would be priced around $93 at P/E of 100.

Recall some of the friends/colleagues told the experience that during the .com bubble, they sold the company incentive stocks either too early or too late, missing the peak, ended up only got a BMW rather than a new house. No one knows what price would be after the 3-6 months lock down, if the...

This crazy thing has very low volume, though.

Normally people don't play this kind of crazy stock, but watching this over these days, I wonder if to allocate like 2% of the trading capital to such HKD thing, would it be a good idea?