Search results

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/14384110.htm http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/living/education/14331100.htm http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/local/14338630.htm

You can either ignore him, or present counter arguments and quote as many articles as you like. Drown him in quoted long articles! No need to be so rude.

Below is an article by a scientist DarkSyde. It gives us some idea how biotechnology is developed. If you invest in biotech this might give you some useful perspective. The original post can be found here: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/21/71130/6022

Videos here http://youtube.com/watch?v=XUMKS4BHk0k&search=bush%20backrub http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQSQXgdkmeo&mode=user&search=

http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=73040 http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/39135/ google "miserable failure" and see what you find.

Lieberman gets endorsement from Merkel

I agree completely that moral standards are transcultural. Here we have spaghetti, in China they have noodles, and in Japan they have raman. I'm sure in cultures that I don't know they all have something similar. This proves beyond any doubt the existance of an all-powerful Flying Spaghetti Monster!

I say it again: Your are completely missing the point Let's see how many times before you get it. I'm not offering a proof that God does or does not exist. I don't believe that anyone here is offering a proof. The point is, there is no scientific way to prove it either way. Are you...

That's off by about 6 orders of magnitude: Try "1,000,000 murders." :D

You just keep missing the point completely. He was arguing that there is NO scientific way to prove that God exists. So it just boils down who has the loudest voice. In that case, why would the Christian God be the One instead of, say, the Flying Spaghetti Monster? If I had to pick a God...

Those "human lives" are destroyed whether or not they are used for research. Does Bush expect those egg cells to survive after they are flushed down the toilet? Frog eggs maybe, but not human ones. Who is he kidding?

Such language will not win you any friends - even nonJewish ones.

As I posted in another thread, let's be fair. This is a 1956 law. And the State Department has waived the fees for evacuees. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/18/lebanon.evacuation/index.html One does not have to blame everything on Bush.

This is either from someone who is intimidated by Gore's intellect or is simply malicious smearing. I've met Gore in person several times. He is warm, smart, and have a really good sense of humor, quite opposite of his public image. On second thought, maybe you are simply extrapolating from...

Instead, we have a really "sh*t"ty president. How can any candidate (Kerry included) not be better that Bush? Seriously? This poll was last November. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/11/04/opinion/polls/main1011154.shtml I'm sure there is an even larger buyr's remorse today.

This was not directed at me and we never know what alternative history would be but .... Gore would not have been on vacation in August. Gore would not have lied. Gore would not have been on vacation in August.

Why did you need to put in the disclaimer? Are you implying that if you were anti Clinton and pro Bush, you wouldn't be stating the facts? Interesting...

Let's be fair. This is a 1956 law. Don't make it sound like it was cooked up by someone in the State Department yesterday.

How about one just for Christian college girls? http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/39135/ Do you prefer a presidential kiss or a presidential backrub?