Search results

Except it can't be. Christian dogma has it that everyone is born with sin. How exactly is not being able to be born without sin, free will? Being able to choose whether you commit sin would sound more like free will. I guess ancient storytellers just didn't think it through.

Hosea. These words in the Bible were supposed to have been written through inspiration of what is called the Holy Spirit, that is supposed to be the word of God isn't it? God says in Hosea that God will be arranging for pregnant women to be "ripped up" and babies "dashed in pieces." Psalms.. is...

Any invisible friend can. It's more about the way in which your ethical and moral standards are diminished by brainwashing yourself into believing it's reasonable for you to excuse and even approve the evil murder of babies and pregnant women because your invisible friend glorifies it in its...

ahh so that's what it is. There was me thinking that murdering babies and pregnant women was inexcusable in any context and no decent human being would ever try to justify such things. But obviously, if it's to do with whether a prophecy is fulfilled, well then, I mean, wtf! Context: Bible...

(Malachi 3:6) "For I am the Lord, I change not" (Hosea 13: 4 16) Yet I am the Lord thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no savior beside me. Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their...

:D

studentofthemarkets What's obvious is we certainly approach the question of religion from entirely opposite directions . You are clearly prepared to accept scripture as true and defend it unreservedly and without question, whereas I am not. However the one over reaching difference between us...

To question religious belief is hatred? Really? "Religious apologists complain bitterly that atheists and secularists are aggressive and hostile in their criticism of them. I always say: look, when you guys were in charge, you didn't argue with us, you just burnt us at the stake. Now what we're...

No problem. I can see why you would concede that way when Expatiated just demonstrated himself how God is basically just a proxy name for the universe. All powerful, existing everywhere etc. stu's wager: Why take the risk of following any religion when it’s likely that any ‘real’ god if there...

The Bible says your condition is sinful therefore you're condition is sinful. That represents little to no reasoning past un-reasoned blind faith. Indeed you dismiss logic and reasoning outside the Bible but contrary to logic and reasoning, claim they're present only within it. Exactly. As...

" God... ...is an illusion. ...created itself. ...is self-existent and eternal. ...was brought into existence by something other than itself. However, for God to be an illusion, there must be something somewhere imagining it. Consequently, explaining the existence of God by claiming...

That is an astonishing thing to say. To think you are prepared to sacrifice reason and logic, two things which if there were a God, it endowed you with. Even though God is only imaginary, I doubt there is any greater testimony you could have made to rival that thankless idea, than for you to...

translation: Don't discuss religion with anyone other than those who already believe in it or want to. Always keep a closed mind for fear that you may come to understand the folly of religious belief. Talk only to those who are prepared to turn themselves into being as gullible as you did and...

You do realize what you're saying? God which is also Jesus set laws making it wrong for everyone to be bad, made everyone bad and to fix it sent his son which is himself, to follow those laws but break them on everyone's behalf as a proxy for everyone. So if there were a God and it had a...

Thanks, but it was like... no answer at all. You said it! Evolutionary science: "Let’s take a look at the evidence and see what conclusions it leads to." Creationist: "Here’s the conclusion, let’s see what evidence we can claim supports it."

That's what's so tragic about the guy. There absolutely are not any scientific reasons for accepting a 'young earth'. Scientific reasons are so opposite to "young earth" it beggars belief how he could claim such a thing. He's making dotty speculations driven by pre-determined religious...

As a young earth creationist, Wise is not doing science, he is doing theology. YEC's start out with an unshakeable conclusion, and then go out to bend or even break any evidence they can to fit that religious belief. You should know that is not how science works. "Although there are scientific...

Holy Intoxication! For similar results, try one of these... ... at least you get to be sober next day. wtf you guys. Are you trying to start an ET online ministry or summink?

Why? I asked you a non-scientific question. The scientist you say is guiding you does at least give a creationist's response as the thread title promises. Problem is, creationism is theology not science, while of course evolution is science. So why is it easier for you to accept something...