Search results

When it comes to the confirmation of historical figures, or the complete lack of it in the case of Jesus, rambling word salads, double speak and contradictions which form your personal beliefs as you express them, are no match for the historical method.

That's all you do. Throw loads of Bible text at everything. Even stuff that has nothing to do with what's being discussed. All you're saying is the Bible is prophesying because the Bible says it prophesying . Even now you don't seem to even understand the sheer futility of that ridiculous idea...

For Historical Against Historical contradiction is such a bitch :p

According to Wikipedia, “Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start: they may contain false or debatable information.” Apart from that, Old Testament (so called) prophets could not use a prophetic perfect tense. No one can. That's because there's no...

WARNING You Have Entered a Bible Thumper's Thread Please set your watches back 2,021 years

There was never an argument that the 'Isaiah Scrolls' don't exist. The argument is, the New Testament authors in their stories, along with blind unthinking closed minded religious believers (like yourself), have later spun tales and fantasies around the scrolls, to create claims of prophesy...

It is parody. It is imitating Biblical style. It is satirical (admittedly very bad) mimicry exemplifying how The New Bible book simply uses the Old Bible book to contrive prophecies. Accounts of subsequent events in the New Testament were clearly tailored to fit earlier ones from the Old...

Talking of fools, in another short episode of "Praise Be, How Do They Do That?", from the authors of "Rabbi Hunting With Dogs"... (The Role of the Typo and Antisemitism) , we look at Old Testament Bible prophesy claimed to come true later in the New Testament. Isiah: Chapter 101: (King Jessy...

To imagine you are doing "what God would have you do, as led by the Holy Spirit," is itself a manifestation of one's own personal sense of greatness. It is a twisted and immoral faith mentality that considers itself set apart in a great fantasy of piety that grants special license to do...

"Several books point out flaws in the Biblical research and archeology cited by Strobel, including 'The Case Against the Case for Christ', by New Testament scholar Robert Price, and 'Challenging the Verdict' by Earl Doherty. True believers may be persuaded, but few serious antiquities scholars...

"There are no birth records, no trial transcripts, no death certificates; there are no expressions of interest, no heated slanders, no passing references - nothing. In fact, if we broaden our field of concern to the years after his [supposed] death - even if we include the entire first century...

Nothing looks more like an inferiority complex than someone trying to accuse others of committing iniquities which their own superstitious religious beliefs require they employ in spades. Mean isn't poking fun at ridiculous religious ideas. Mean - is millennia of suffocating oppression...

2,000 years the religious haven't kept it to themselves. One of the main reasons there are atheists.

People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs

exist

Original sin lol Religion, based on fear and threat and as one of the oldest protection racket scams around, requires that in order for you to avoid imaginary hell and perhaps or perhaps not be eligible for imaginary heaven, you must believe in an imaginary being and imagine it impregnated an...

Even if that were the case then again, it would mean it is still only possible to imagine, pretend, presuppose Bible Jesus was on Earth or that he even existed. Although that might explain why there is no historical evidence that Jesus's big sister Jessie ever existed. One can only imagine...

In the same way everything written about Harry Potter "is a big fat lie" My gosh indeed, but you're not that naive. Didn't you know, since time began people have sure spent a lot of time making all sorts of things up . Especially things to do with religion and superstition even up to the point...

Where there's no historical evidence whatsoever of any kind, direct or indirect to support their historicity, like it is with Jesus, then yes. They can only be imaginary. Got it?