Search results

they can't handle FOB... but they are pretty good though, I find it a bit hard to use which is why I got my money back after I tried it for 30 days... my only experience with tools handling FOB (or the whole data stream as you call it) is with in-house custom apps or CEP tools like APAMA or...

save your money, just go to MIT/YALE/UC/Princeton/Harvard, etc... sites and you will find most of the classes online and for free in video format, just get the books and that is it... to be honest, what you are referring to will not come from a MsC, you will gain the knowledge only via the...

the only retail tool i know will do this, close enough... is neuroshell.. http://www.neuroshell.com/products.asp?task=comparison

you should be looking at entry level arrays that will enable you to present to ZFS ... keep in mind not all your data at rest is active all the time, so placing everything on SSD is not advantageous, best to tier it... imo, which is restricted to what you are saying here without knowing actual...

no, he is not... in concept yes, but in actuality he is far from it... you should not compare based on what you assume actual banks do... he has re-invented a lot of things and if you understood grids you would see the stress points that will be ahead... the nodes checking for work vs. being...

all that stuff is standard, but 3 years is excessive... again... disclose upfront and discuss it... if they are unwilling to alter it, then just find some other contract.

then just disclose and make sure the contract makes the scope clear going in...

you've actually deployed GFS? gutsy... :) ... and yes... still raid... as I said, what has transpired is that more and more vendors have moved to implementing it on the software side where the physical blocks have become objects, all other tech remains the same, but now you can basically grow a...

so it sounds like you had started creating that service before you started the contract? so are you about to start the contract and that is what it says? in that case, just disclose things and make it clear and make sure it is excluded on the contract that any prior work and IP is not theirs...

exactly, you understood what your requirements were, what your app needs were and then accounted for the protection within your db design... some apps will actually suffer performance wise if they get any type of raid, they prefer raw disks to be given and the volume manager, at the OS or app...

they still do... they are just doing it with storage nodes... lastly, more and more file systems have the protection now built in... so it has moved more to the software and become object based than at the physical layer and dealing with blocks...

lol...nope bud...

ok, will make it simple... if you use any of the code/ideas/etc... generated or used while under contract to deliver your services or products as directed by them on anything that you will commercialize, the answer is they own it... that is my understanding for developers.. usually that...

not following... are you creating a platform for FX for a company? if so, anything related to that effort belongs to them... if you are creating that platform, but then come up with a new indicator that can be used in that platform on your own time? then maybe...

was it done as part of your contract to facilitate your tasks as they related to: "the Company operations and/or in the delivery of the Services " then yes... if nothing to do with the company or the job you did while there, more than likely, possibly not...

LMAO.... hmmm... please tell me how to store 70TB of data without raid... last I checked, the biggest drive on the market is 4TB... I can of course use a Violin with 20TB, but there is cost associated with that (unless you are an actual bank that can afford it, and we dont even deploy it...

interesting that you guys are having issues with storage... but without knowing what vendors you are using, etc... hard to express an opinion... any trading activity/business generates tons and tons of data... but I dont think that should be a huge issue, my RDO teams manage about 5PB+ and...

+1 overall, but if you do 3K round trips on anything, you've already paid in transaction fees for the platform (like N7) for CQG... and you are better off doing CQGTrader, it is the same basically... $25 and capped at $395...

interesting... so in itself, CQG is expensive depending on how and what you are trading.. BLP tradebook is more expensive :) if you are spreading(cross exchange or multi-leg spreading), feel like trading yield curve by actually seeing it, would like to have access to pre-trade analytics, want...

am lost, first... it was reading the tape, now using bb... how come you dont stick to one thing and follow through with it until you figure it out 100%? curious.. you seem to be jumping around a lot...