Search results

Really? Then what about Jack's "17 leading indicators?" Which are really lagging indicators like Stoch and MACD, but the point is that Jack calls them leading. Misleading would probably be more accurate...

Actually, your example of the "NOW" ("market is rising") encompasses the past because markets move in discrete steps called ticks... so when you speak of "rising," it is the current tick relative to one or more lower ticks in the past (at greatest resolution). Of course you can "zoom out" but...

We can't do enough for our veterans but unfortunately, they're getting second class treatment along with a lot of lip service from the administration. Uh oh! I agree, in a single day, with a second thing that Jack's written. I must have stumbled into the Twilight Zone.

I agree... :eek: that was not how I meant it but then again, I was distracted when I wrote it!

No, the gotcha's on you! Because in Jack's "tomorrow's paper today" there's no mention of any of that garbage so I tested only what Jack wrote and it bombed out bigtime. And with "rockets," the first thing I tested was again, exactly what Jack wrote. I even quoted it and Jack said...

Things like NO prior info or knowledge, different market conditions, sufficient # trades (I prefer several thousand), etc. 111 trades over 6 months is crap. I can find 6 month periods that make moving average systems look like the Holy Grail.

Not sure what you mean... but I do know that it was valid enough to make Jack try to defend his -23.8% "performance."

Apparently your ivy league education (if you really have one) was a total waste of money... a six month period with only 111 trades is meaningless. Not to mention that Spydie didn't even say what, specifically, he posted the results for. Compare that to my backtest of buying the 0 to 7 turn...

Of course! http://groups.google.com/group/misc.invest.technical/browse_frm/thread/95408af0696a2e3a/88dcc788355b6a42?tvc=1&q=jack+hershey+software&hl=en#88dcc788355b6a42

P.S. In this recent post: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1363510#post1363510 Jackass Hershey told me: "The A team is old hat we are now the PhD's.. Keep up with things." What does that stand for? Pseudointellectual Hersheyean Dumbasses? Phoney Hersheyean...

Being a braggart here on ET sure keeps you under the radar, doesn't it? How about posting your test results? Jack has said that backtesting doesn't work so there seems to be a conflict, doesn't there? Would you please explain this?

Yeah, that will happen when pigs grow wings and fly. Prove me wrong by posting code and results...

Yeah, nwbprop is a great example!

Wow, you would have made an ideal candidate for Jim Jones' or Marshall Applewhite's cult.

Well of course nothing's as exciting to you guys as pretending to be great traders on the internet!

Warm up? Journal III? I rest my case. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1359525#post1359525 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1363495#post1363495

You're so totally full of %^&@. LOL!!!!! Call me now! I'm standing by, waiting for your call... just like I'm standing by, waiting for you and your misfits to enter this contest... just like I'm standing by, waiting for hell to freeze over!

Where's The "A Team?" Why haven't Jack's minions encouraged him to show his stuff? Better yet, why doesn't the entire "A Team" (Jack, Spyder, MAK, nwbprop, etc.) enter this to get international acclaim? I can't believe that you'd pass up this opportunity. Unless, of course, you're afraid...

I agree but Jack's said in this thread that playing this wouldn't be too difficult. So I for one would like to see him back up his claims.

ROTFLMAO!!!! More obfuscation to hide the fact that you couldn't trade your way out of a paper bag. My original prediction still stands: NO WAY will you enter this under your own name AND trade for the duration of the contest, because it would show what you're really made of...