Search results

I'll supply the popcorn.

Cool, thanks for posting.

Since there is no obvious point 3 to work with by your standards, I defaulted to the last bar before the gaussian reversal, under the assumption that BOs of RTLs occur at R2R.

a closeup w/out the trav

a close up of the travs including the hidden traverse

Maybe someone else can comment on this too, but here is what I see. It seems to me that the dominant traverse here is disguised amidst the red bars, and that's why you don't see increasing black. But I could be wrong. In my gaussians i basically chose to discount those three flaw-ish bars...

ES

To each his own. Some people draw tapes and fan out until they get a PT3. Some people wait like yourself. I tend to be somewhere inbetween.

Glad you enjoyed it. :) I'm sure I left out a couple things. I actually tend not to use tapes too much, so that may explain it. Perhaps when Bundlemaker *cough* gets around to making his next amazing video he will be more thorough :cool:

You don't have to wait until something is "proven" before you draw it. In fact, before the 1135 bar I also used the 1120 bar and the 1100 bars as PT3s. PT3 got moved up to where it is now because price BO'ed on decreasing volume, which tells me that my RTL is "incorrect."

ivo, looks like you're missing a CO.

Spooz- While the huge red bar did not scream "change" to me, the huuuger FTT that ensued did :) So we probably ended up in the same place anyway...

Good morning all, If anyone wants to review their gaussian concepts, here's my attempt at explaining (at the IBD Tucson meetup). Skip to around 7min45sec: video download [173MB camtasia file] (right click, save as...) camtasia_codec.exe (in case you don't already have it) I hope...

lol, if you want to get technical and stuff ;-) but in reality, for the purpose of "making money," wouldn't you still treat a 50k red bar exactly like you'd treat a 20k red bar? i mean, you're short either way and making bank, so it's just a funny thing to argue about :-) although i can...

oh wow, i missed what your point was the first time around... pretty big data discrepancy!!! who is your provider?

nk- looks like spyder annotated a tree channel there, mine is forest. i think both are correct.

5-24-07 ES chart

Just be sure to exercise some caution here-- STR/SQU is not a standalone signal. If you have a sufficient data set that tells you that it is "appropriate" to enter, then there is no reason to watch/wait for a STR/SQU signal.

ivob brought to my attention today a really cool QT tool... right-click your RTL to make a "trend line alert" that will blow a horn at you or something when the RTL is breached. so, if you are a strict forest trader, you can read a book or play a game and not worry when price is nowhere near...

.