Search results

The whole argument that you are trying to debunk is this Basically the idea that the subprime crisis was caused by democrats who urged companies like fannie mae to lend to low income families and minorities. I pointed out that Clinton absolutely pushed very hard for mortgage companies...

I fail miserably? You didn't address a single one of my points. However I will address yours. The democrats absolutely pushed mortgage companies to make loans that they shouldn't have made. I never said they didn't. I have never excused them. I have never advocated the CRA or excused...

Gosh, I just..I guess I'm not very smart :(. I just don't see any of the following questions being answered... 1.Explain to me how FNMA, with a market share of less than 10% of subprime loans, can be responsible for the 350% increase in subprime loans originated from 2002-2006 2.Explain to...

This is for all of you: You cannot just say a certain argument is wrong without structuring an intelligent rebuttal. You have to actually construct a counter argument that addresses the points. Geeze, you're like the 12 year old who can say only 'I know you , but what am I". If you can't...

lol is that a joke? You never even came back after I owned all your idiotic points with statements I had already made. I wouldn't have come back either if I were you. You were the only conservative here stupid enough to touch it. why do you think hardly anyone else said anything? Think about...

I just realized just how ridiculous you actually are. How do you deal with it? Is it a conscious decision? Or are you completely oblivious?

haha which ones, the ones where I make VALID points that apparently no one here can refute? Whats funny is that on the political forums, I get actual discussion and debate. Here I just like to watch you guys squirm around because you don't have any real rebuttals (hence all the shit talking).

Yet another intelligent, well thought out, point.

Chart patterns are PA though...

Lmao

Your strange punctuation notwithstanding, maybe you can start a thread on a particular topic, with well thought out reasoning behind why you dissagree with a certain policy. Or you could just start the same old BS thread about how much you hate him.

lol, i swear what do you people do, see how much shit you can talk about Obama everyday? half of it doesn't make sense. I could start a thread called "Obama is a punk" with the content being "Obama=punk" and it would get 5 star rating and 5,000 views lol

lol I like it.

Thats what I would say, I could see that, but... True, but the same could be said of the droves of conservatives who DON'T want to see gays marry because they believe it is a sacred vow between a man and a women. I agree, but they want to be able to say that they are "married". It...

It will come down to matter of opinion eventually, but IMHO It's such a tempestuous topic, especially in the south. I wonder though if people are contemplating the real question. It is not about whether you agree with gay marriage or not. It is not about whether you think its right or wrong...

Well that is the rub isn't it? i personally don't like gay marriage, but it is nothing more than big government for us to deny them the right. which is ok with me, its just funny because usually the people that are against gay marriage are also against big government, when a gay marriage ban...

You guys should read more magazine and books. Basing all your political analysis and judgment only on what Rush says isn't advisable. I'm just saying....

Where you at FHL? I challenge you to actually rebuke my points, one by one. No need to talk shit. Construct a real rebuttal of my points. I'm such an idiot, it should be easy :)

Whew, it would be tough to know. I don't pretend to understand the real complexities of the leveraged, bought and insured CDO's versus how much money was lent out and, God knows, how much of it is actually secured by something real.