Search results

Haroki, I notice that you have never commented on the FACT that Silverstein admitted the controlled demolition of building 7 in an interview. Also, why did John Kerry then corroborate this and agree in an interview that building 7 was brought down for reasons of safety...

Testimonies of FDYN and NYPD officers who heard explosions coming from wtc1and wtc2 good enough for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N2VjxCHBcs Building 7 was evacuated and blocked off up an hour before it was "pulled" by the FDYN.

No the Main building structure (north wall as you put it) takes 6.5 seconds to fall to the ground. This can be seen on any CNN, FOX, BBC footage, as well as in your's. 47 steel columns were disturbuted thoughout the building, not just under th penthouse ... hell what do you think was...

So you deny that you stated that the North Wall takes 7 seconds to come down? I agree with you the North wall took 7 seconds to collapse to the ground. Again, this is only possible if each floor meets no resistance from the one below. With colums around the perimiter (they were evenly...

You just proved my point, yes 7 (6.5 to be exact) seconds for the top of the MAIN building structure to collapse vertically to the ground. The penthouse is an attachment at the top of the MAIN building structure. After the penthouse has collapsed (8 seconds) it doesn't change the fact that the...

He did his analysis based on the speed of the collapse of wtc7 which was 6.5 seconds. This is undisputed. Again, his analysis points to the exact timed symetrical failure of each floor's horizontal steel column to fail in succession from the ground up in a precise manner to create a scenario...

Ok you use the nearest distance from wtc1 to building 7 then yes I agree, it is 400 feet. The chunks of concrete and steel debris stil have to travel 400 feet from wtc1, clearing building 6 to reach building 7. Again if gravity was the only force applied to the burning debris as wtc1 burned...

Ok you wanted a quote: Hugo Bachmann, a Swiss professor emeritus for structural design and construction, said in Tages-Anzeiger : "In my opinion WTC 7 was with great probability brought down by controlled demolition done by experts". In addition, Jörg Schneider, another Swiss Professor...

You are basically asking me if there are any structural engineers that agree that the laws of physics applied to building 7.

Another thing Haroki. Can you explain to me how large chunks of burning debris were able to travel from wtc1&2 directly over buildings 6&7 to building 7 which was 340 yards away. If you understand the laws of conservation of momentum you will know that a sufficient horizontal force would have...

You seem to be misunderstanding the point here. Building 7 collapsed in 6.5 seconds. For this to happen the fire would have to completely take out the supporting steel frame on each floor (starting from the bottom) completely symetrically around the floor and sychronised to a fraction of a...

Hey if you don't do physics then ask yourself why Silverstein admitted the controlled demolition of building 7 in an interview. Also, why did John Kerry then corroborate this and agree in an interview that building 7 was brought down for reasons of safety...

I suppose you would ask me for a quote if i told you that the world was round and not flat! In fact, probably you could even dig out a popularmechanics quote that argue that the world is flat. Many independent physists and engineers have looked at the building 7 collapse. Here are a few...

Which ones? The structural engineers speaking honestly or the structural engineers employed by popularmechanics?

I hate to be the one to point this out to you, but you appear to not have progressed past your Denial stage. The ideas put forward by were popularmechanic are a joke to anyone who has studied physics to a serious level. It's a free world, you believe what you want to. That's your business.

Yes you clearly have something important to do instead of dropping your little gems of brainlessness all over this thread. I agree, if the thread started on 9/24 there is no way you could have created an alias on 9/25 would mean you only had 24 hour to do it. Yep you sold me on that one...

Unlike you, I don't need to use aliases so I won't be taking your advice. Now, I have to give credit where credits due, your stupidity is top notch, but hey little fella, go and show it off to some other ET members, why should I get all the laughs.

Yep just another guy who joined last week. Oh yeah no way you could be Haroki, dddodo or Hapaboy. I shouldn't laugh at you, but it's not everyday you come across such a cretin. Welcome to ET brainiac.

Very recently joined I see. Would you be Haroki, Hapaboy, dddodo or some other disgruntled psycho? How sad ...

You are not very good at the whole reality thing are you Hapaboy? I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, probably you mean well, but have just been mislead along the way. The truth is, your arguments are foolish and badly thought out at best and subsequently you always seem to come out...