Search results

Her DP scenes are 1.5 yrs from now, while her gangbang scenes are a few years from now. Who knows. Or maybe she'll get lucky, marry a rich dude, then become a socialite.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/farrah-abraham-rejected-playboy-report-article-1.1399031 She doesn't quite fit Playboy's quality of women.

Ashley Dupre now living the life of a trophy wife. Reminds me of one Goldman Sachs managing director, Yann Samuelides, who married a hooker. http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/ashley-dupre-spotted-newborn-baby-girl-article-1.1247363...

Bubble Ben is already sowing the seeds to the next financial or banking crisis.

Cuz they all now want to be rappers rapping about nikes on my feet and getting high instead of becoming doctors or lawyers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-rqu-hjobc

ROTFLMAO:D

It's always good to work in a premier IB. Big companies will work you hard, but you gain experience and training not available elsewhere. Then, the resume is considered gold-plated relative to other resumes. Simply look at the number of major hedge funds with billion dollar launches or AUM. Many...

I too have been down the Tom Demark indicator(s) rabbit hole and lost money :confused: :( :mad: I think the main way he makes money is to try to convince people of the value of his trademarked indicators in order to license them to Bloomberg. http://www.marketstudies.com/cm/content/Bloomberg.asp

Indirectly, Jaimie Dimon has something to say about that. http://www.bloomberg.com/video/dimon-throws-down-at-investor-conference-G6o~Ac75SkeeFo5JCpjXBQ.html

Donald Trump! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74TFS8r_SMI

Borg vs. Species 8472 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gn02c176YuI

Touche. History rhymes.

I think the main question is "Can stocks go down despite massive QE?" (i.e. will the correlation between rising stock market and rising Fed balance sheet continue indefinitely?) Without QE causing the type of inflation that would inflate earnings correspondingly, my opinion is that there is...

That's the name of a book. http://www.amazon.com/Rule-Freakin-Markets-Profit-Market/dp/B00BJZ5SNO/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1373598561&sr=1-1&keywords=rule+the+freaking+market

"Highly accommodative policy" has always been the case since Lehman. The only difference is ultra accommodative vs. less ultra accommodative. I think it's market's interpretation of Bernanke. There's the stock market interpretation, which is different from the bond market's interpretation...

Just looking at the price action of the 30 year vs. the mortgage reits, one can see the T-bond slightly selling off from the highs, whereas the mortgage reits rallied sharply. Reading the tea leaves, one may surmise that maybe the Fed will announce a plan (only a PLAN) to taper treasury bond...

I think they do, which is why they want to contain any equity sell-off in order to help Karen the Supertrader record her record profits that will cement her name into the Market Wizards Hall of Fame.

I'm sure the even more dovish successor will exit at an appropriate time.

He rules the stock market.

Fed doublespeak ensures calm markets.