Search results

Sorry, I removed it - something didn't feel right. Here's the removed chart attached, so that your comments make sense to those who read it.

.

Don't you ever wonder why things are the way they are? P.S. The word you have so facetiously misspelled comes from Latin: manus ("hand") and turbare ("to disturb"), which is precisely how one would describe your comments.

from another thread: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2086213#post2086213

Yes, me too.

Pivot Points. Is anybody using them successfully and what is the logic behind creating a 'proprietary' type of s/r levels?

The point I was trying to make is that since fib numbers represent one of the fundamental laws (based on how they are derived) of nature and as such there may be a way to use these principles in trading. That's all.

http://milan.milanovic.org/math/english/division/division.html "Where a cell exists, there must have been a preexisting cell, just as the animal arises only from an animal and a plant only from a plant." "Omnis cellula e cellula" or "All cells from cells." - Rudolf Virchow (1855). The ability...

Circular Reasoning – supporting a premise with the premise rather than a conclusion. Circular reasoning is an attempt to support a statement by simply repeating the statement in different or stronger terms. In this fallacy, the reason given is nothing more than a restatement of the...

1300 bar is PA and VE. Next bar is also a VE. I can not imagine it to be anything other than that - an accelerated traverse or the original traverse becoming a channel.

Yeah, that was one hell of a logic. Desperate men do desperate things. I am writing that whole thing off just like today as outliers (in my case inverted outliers).:D

Funny that you've mentioned it - I have studied that particular day on and off quite a few times in the past 6 mo. Just be careful not to follow in my footsteps - you just may end up being where I am right now. EDIT: Going back to the beginning.

Short 853.00 on 1725 bar - increasing PRV on YM? Close 850.00 on 1735 bar - increasing black PRV on YM? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thank you.

For example, long at 853.25 on 1700 bar, was it because of decreasing red PRV? And close at 856.50 because YM wasn't showing increasing black volume? Then long again 851.25 - trendline break? Close at 853.50 - no increasing black?

Damn, Mr. Black!:) You're good - are you using YM to carve the tapes? If you could share some of the thoughts on these trades, I'd appreciate it. Because this holding through retraces stuff isn't working for me - I think this scalping of yours may be a reasonably consistent way to put bread on...

I have another word, actually a few words to describe somewhat similar feeling I am experiencing, but I am going to restrain myself from expressing, as they are somewhat offensive.

.

I don't get the logic here. On Fri we had down traverse followed by up traverse. The up traverse did not have the sequence completed and the day ended in lateral formation. One would expect, according to Pre-Flight check, completion of the sequence for the Fri's blue up travers and the signal...

And how we are suppose to 'know' that the down channel is being built? Any thoughts?

YESSS! Thank you. 1430 and 1435 don't break the tape. I have to see if this holds any significance and if one can treat reverse pennant (1425 and 1430) as one bar per JH, - then, if one doesn't consider 1425 as dominant bar, - 1440 is spike and perhaps there was no return to dominance there...