And there is no benefit for voting US taxpayers to bailout bankrupt countries, so why would politicians engineer a multi-billion bailout?? You should start there. It's not the same thing reading between the lines and insisting that there MUST be something corrupt with all actions coming from...
Political careers were killed and people were indicted because of that scandal. The Reagan administration screwed up there and paid for it.
It's not like in Latin America, one government screws up and the next declares amnesty. Here there is some accountability.
How would YOU know, you don't even live here. But I understand, you latin american people are damaged goods, you have had nothing but corrupt dictators and abusive military.
That's why you're so skeptic, you think the US is no different. I pity you.
There are "humanitarians" like Carter who believe it is America's responsibility to stop 3rd world countries to kill themselves. You know nothing about the objectives of American foreign policy, its motivations are not solely economic. Only marxists think the only motivation for US foreign...
First, the oil BS is FALSE, the facts are all over the place you need only a minimum IQ to tie the facts together and conclude the US wouldn't give a sh*t about Iraq's oil.
1973 solved itself because the OPEC realized a price-gouging cartel is not economically viable. In effect they realized...
These people do not represent the majority and they don't even influence the government.
Only an idiot would believe the fallacy than since a few american think america should rule the world, all americans think that way too.
Geez, we even have an American al-qaeda fighter, does that mean...
You should ask yourself what would have happened in the middle east had the US distanced itself from the region.
You should ask yourself also what would have happened if the US government didn't expressely ask the IMF to bailout bankrupt latin american countries like Brazil and Argentina? If...
Instead of Arnett, NBC should have sent John Lindh Walker, Jose Padilla or that Columbia University professor who's cheering Saddass's army, any of them would have been less biased.
Actually, there are plenty of Americans that wouldn't be happier if the US stops spending money in other countries for whatever reasons.
But US foreign policy exists because it is not in our self interest if 3rd world dictators blow up the same planet we live in, and because some people think...
As a matter of fact ALL leftie freaks change the subject all the time, their position rarely can be sustained by rational arguments. Anti-americanism is basically an emotional pathology, people feel they have been wronged, so they blame America.
So in conclusion it's more important for you to be politically correct and cry for all the native americans killed 100-200 years ago, rather than devise ways to integrate them into American society?
Do you in Latin America try to integrate natives into society or just give a sh*t if they live...
So the right-wing regimes in your own country are the real culprits for your misery? Agree.
Did the US support them? Yes, but the problem is that you people don't give the US many choices, it's either a corrupt right wing government, or an extremist communist rabidly anti-american government...
You are changing subjects, but I can see why, in your marxist mind exporting capitalism and military intervention are one and the same thing.
And yes, it's your own fault because you don't have the balls to throw the corrupts out of your government. Only when you don't have anything to eat...
What we don't understand is why whiny thirld-world bums like you blame America for everything instead of working their ass off to create wealth just like we do.
If you and your people like to live in shacks and spend their time dancing tango, drinking mate, and reading the communist manifesto...
The owners of this website make money from web traffic, since that attracts advertisers, but the contents spewed by the staunchest anti-american traitors in some threads causes a lot of "fake" traffic that 1. has nothing to do with trading and 2. comes from piss poor thirld word countries like...
Socialist/pacifist morons by definition cannot be good traders.
Since they believe all the sh*it that happens in the world is someone else's fault, when they lose it's because markets are manipulated, the CIA is controlling their mind and making them lose or something like that.
So they are...