Search results

CNBC has a vested interest in keeping the mom and pop investors in the game and mom and pop investors are net long....they don't spin everything in negativity, if anything they do the opposite.

Told you at least twice so far that my trading frames are much faster than yours and, when I get signals I am actively sizing in and managing my positions. Last thing I have time to do is post a trade. Right now am between trades so I have time to post this. If you are/were a real trader, you'd...

LOL.....why are you responding to my post? I didn't quote you and aren't you a 'winning' trader? :confused:

Same old story, losing traders all jump on each others bandwagons and winning traders on theirs.....this argument will never end. If you ever see me posting on a site called tradingisnotpossible.com, then let me have it....not sure why all the losing traders hang out on a site called...

LOL...good one 777 :D

bearice doesnt need to be banned, he is locked in the dungeon down here.....that's enough for me :D

As can you :)

Sounds like trading was a delusion for you (as you put it), eeking out a living before penny spreads says a lot, many were absolutely banking during this time. If you could barely get by it was a very smart move of you to move on. Trading isn't for everyone. Sounds like you are a lot happier now...

I hope you one day graduate from hobby trader to serious trader, it'll change your perspective on the business. :)

You are wrong. What is to stop Bearice from creating 100 aliases and then having them all vote to ban someone?

So you'd rather be rich and famous than rich and anonymous? Since these are the two choices that the threads premise is built on. I'd rather take my chances on people I love and trust than on complete strangers.

I'm pretty sure I have a better vantage point over my own life, my own family and my own friends than you have :p

You're right, Zuckerberg didn't spend thousands of hours coding facebook. He just thought of this great social networking idea and, POOF, it happened. No brains were required at all.....it's just a wonder why Dalmation didn't come up with this wonderful wealth creating concept himself first...

I hear ya, but this is OFF TOPIC. Did you even read the OP? My answers have been based off of the OP's premise. If you had a system that earned 100 mil per year (his words not mine) would you rather be rich and anonymous or rich and celebrity. My answer was, if I was the owner of such...

Dalmation is always on the wrong page, active income is the subject of this thread, if he wants to inject a new variable then he should make that clear. :)

:D

You are off topic Surf, the OP gave two choices (rich and anonymous or rich and celebrity) and so that's what my answer was based off of. I stayed on topic and got attacked....weird.

So money magically appears in their bank accounts? Please, sign me up for that! LOL PS I thought marketsurfer didn't "attack" people? Guess he does under aliases....got a nice little scam going there :)

You are taking the perspective of any joe shmoe, I'm looking at it as actually EARNING the 100 million/yr which one would assume would be done by someone with brains and discipline. The OP didn't mention randomly coming into money, but actually earning it. I'm just staying on topic. I agree...

S2007S!!!