Search results

I traded GROW for a $3 profit and I know a bunch of others did much, much better on it. Is it really possible to be disappointed with a $3 profit?? TNG

1. true, but it's still absolutely ridiculous 2. I don't know, but at the beginning of the video I saw on the news it looks like they were arguing and it looked like she actually pushed him a little bit. He was apparantly quite drunk and pissing her off. Obviously, he has a bit of a...

I have no idea why I'm getting in the middle of this, but wasn't Julius Epstein a writer? I think the guy's name is Jeffrey Epstein. Anyway, continue on with your religious war.... TNG

That was brutal wasn't it? Also, someone attempted to bribe the bar after it happened. At first I heard there were death threats too, but the news has stopped saying that. The cops here are rough in general. I don't like asking them questions and if they ever talk to you, it's usually to...

Took the word out of my mouth.... TNG

Don't have or know anyone with experience with it. It depends on your needs, but I'd seriously look into a direct access platform like IB or MB Trader or Redi plus or something. That's just my opinion, however. TNG

Man, people are just mean these days.... lol A direct access broker is necessary for active trading. Most here (all maybe?) will use some sort of DA broker. I believe IB is what the majority use, but check out the "brokers" link at the top of this page for reviews and more info. A full...

I don't trade options, but I would imagine the IV has gone ballistic this week. Depending on your strategy, that could matter a lot. TNG

The example I posted has EXACTLY the same parameters on both sides. TNG

Funny, I posted mathematical proofs that this is incorrect, and you keep stating it like it's a fact. Oh well, hard to debate when only one side is bringing facts to the table. TNG

That is incorrect, and you don't understand EV. - TNG

No, that's not true. Did you look at my attachment? "be it 30 percent or 70 percent" is incorrect. EV is your profitability of the system overall, it is not dependent on one variable alone. Simple math, as you like to put it. The profitability of scaling out solely depends on your...

That's a matter of preference. I think inadvertantly there are a lot of people here arguing against trading like this. Mathematically speaking, it doesn't matter whether your probabilities are high as long as your EV is high. TNG

Round and round we go with the same arguments being made and you (B1S2) with the same retorts. The long and short of this argument is that there are two variables in the expected value formula that are needed to make either argument. One is probability and one is payout. What you are...

I have no problem with that. I don't care what it does for him or others, but it makes me money, so I use it. TNG

And furthermore, why should I give a rats ass if Jack is profitable or not? Using his equities method I caught NVEC yesterday, which went for a %21 ride, as did many others. AGAIN I might add. Personally I hope none of you doubters bother to look into this stuff. TNG

You're not, be read the beginning of this thread! This always boils down to the same argument. Someone wants proof that what someone else is doing is making money. The funniest part about it is that the proof is all over this site and they are too damn lazy to go find it! TNG

Asking other people to "prove" to you whether a method works or not is definately laziness. Who cares if it makes them $1 or $1 million?? What does it do for you should be the only question you need to ask. That's not something anyone else can answer for you anyway. TNG

Except that your simple math is incorrect, as I pointed out months ago. TNG

If you have access to a BB terminal they have a set a features regarding M&A but it's been years since I used those commands... you could get real time MA news on there though. Thanks, TNG