Search results

When we drive a car, fly a plane or trade markets our ability to succeed strictly depends on how fast and accurate we make crucial decisions. Highly dynamic, rapidly evolving situations (especially if they are surrounded by a high degree of uncertainty) demand us to be nimble and not to rely on...

Because information technology evolves much faster than we can, the gap between our data comprehension capabilities and constantly increasing flow of facts is exponentially widening. More and more often we find ourselves in the situation where we just don’t have enough time to use our logic...

In his 1956 ground-breaking book “An Introduction to Cybernetics” William Ross Ashby has presented to us the law of Requisite Variety. What this law simply states is that for any system to be stable the number of distinct states (variety) that its control mechanism is capable of producing...

According to the last communication with baron it appears that my previous thread is most likely lost forever. Although it feels painful and somewhat unnatural to resurrect a thread I might have to do it. The thing is that I have received over 30 PMs and email messages from people who would like...

Good news! I just spoke with baron on the phone and he thinks he should be able to recover the thread by tomorrow. Keeping my fingers crossed. MAESTRO

Thank you! That sounds awfully familiar. We might have very similar views of the market. Interesting! MAESTRO

Yes, I am trying to recover the pages from it now. It might take time. I have sent the email to baron; we shall see what I can salvage. MAESTRO

Sorry to be a pest, but could you please post the link to the post that explains it? I could not find it. Probably the old age syndrome :)

Is there a way to describe what you call "Price Drivers" in a few sentences without giving the actual formulas away? (If you feel uncomfortable to disclose them in full) I was trying to guess what you call Price Drivers is; It would be helpful (again, if you do not mind sharing). MAESTRO

In almost 9 years of me being on ET I have never pitched anything except the knowledge, education and discussions. If they do not restore the thread I am not coming back. Cheers, MAESTRO P.S. Thank you for your support

My Thread "Intuition Amplifiers" has been completely removed. Anybody knows why? MAESTRO

It has been a long time since I posted anything on this distinguished forum. The topic at hand is obviously not new and has been discussed at least 10 times since I joined this site back in early 2000s. As in my previous posts I would like to make a suggestion. In order for this discussion to...

It has been done successfully here: http://mobileintegratedsystems.com/mobi-finance/stealth-analytics Cheers, MAESTRO

A wide open area for interpretations. I am not sure, however, I understood it entirely (scratching his head) MAESTRO

Good point!

I would agree with that. Of course, the whole point here is to find those patterns. I have always found mine in the different types of price/time distributions. I am not saying it is the only right approach; markets are like chess - there are unlimited number of potentially successful strategies...

This thread is one of the very few threads on ET that is actually pleasant to read. I am glad that the most of participants exhibit different points of view but generally refrain from mutual assaults and childish remarks. I urge all of the participants to continue this very valid discussion and...

I am very familiar with the article. In my opinion there is a slight confusion between the RW types and their implementations as models for price behavior. This subject is extremely fruitful for anybody who wants to have an edge in trading. From my 20 years of experience I can tell you that...

I like this discussion. I also like when people argue while maintaining the respect for each other's opinions. For the record, I do understand and respect your point of view. About 15 years ago I had very similar views on the market and was hoping to extract useful information out of the price...

I thought you implied that you agree with the title of the article. My apologies.